Ratings for writer paradise
 |
Real name Username |
paradise |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by vutha123 2012-06-20Rated with
by lcp03o 2012-06-20Rated with
by lockys 2012-06-20Rated with
by kilfeatherm@btinternet.com 2012-06-20Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-06-20Thanks
Rated with
by jwsatman 2012-06-20Please remove reference to California. It has nothing to do with our client or what we're trying to achieve. THanks.
Rated with
by seoamp 2012-06-18Rated with
by seoamp 2012-06-18Rated with
by seoamp 2012-06-18Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-06-18Thanks
Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-06-18Text in not structured at all and with many mistakes.
Rated with
by chasemorgan15 2012-06-17ok
Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-06-16Rated with
by dannypenrose 2012-06-16Copy was a little "flaky" with couple of grammatical errors however the tonne is fantastic and the brief was followed exactly as requested. Turnaround time was outstanding (around 1 hour), overall 5 stars.
Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-06-15Thanks
Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-06-15Thanks
Rated with
by mayateam 2012-06-15Rated with
by coby8740 2012-06-14Good use of the keyword, but the content is not accurate. It's close and I almost accepted it, but too much to re-write. Some grammar issues. Sorry.
Rated with
by yihlong 2012-06-14Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-06-14Thanks
Rated with
by zrockk 2012-06-13The article doesn't have a cohesive connection throughout, has grammar issues and uses the same word in a sentence too often, for ex, using the word "plenty" twice in same sentence.
Rated with
by weblinx 2012-06-13The article looks as though it's written in a rushed manor and doesn't read correctly. There are a lot of times where unnecessary words are stuffed and out of context.
Responded with comment: wont write for again.
Rated with
by 2jdesign 2012-06-13Rated with
by mayateam 2012-06-13Rated with
by mayateam 2012-06-13