Ratings for writer T.S. SARASWATHI
 |
Real name Username |
saraswathi58 |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
| Cannot show writer bio. It may contain contact info... | ||||
Rated with
by douglasltc 2011-10-07 for Article: Reducing Cholesterol NaturallyRequested a PRODUCT REVIEW article - URL of the sales page included in the instruction. Wring type of article written. It is a pity as this written article is quite good. Unfortunately, this is NOT what I requested.
Rated with
by derekjones124 2011-10-06 for Article: Medical office administrationBad English, some sentences do not make sense.
Rated with
by wesleyr 2011-10-06 for Article: Partnership agreementDidn't make much sense!
Rated with
by jkuhry 2011-10-06 for Article: Core exercise for womenThanks nice writing!
Rated with
by jkuhry 2011-10-06 for Article: Benefits of wheatgrassThank you great job!
Rated with
by simonwade 2011-10-05 for Article: How to advertise your businesssatisfactory but the sentences seem stiff as if the authors command of english is not great
Rated with
by Rpbcobiz 2011-10-05 for Article: Losing weight after pregnancyRated with
by bkonia 2011-10-05 for Article: Carisoprodol Writer needs to learn English
Rated with
by ringitinc 2011-10-05 for Article: How To Write A Cover Letter For A ResumeGood Article
Rated with
by ringitinc 2011-10-05 for Article: Chinese pregnancy calendarRated with
by ianbong 2011-10-05Very bad sentence structure, grammar not up to par, although content was okay.
Rated with
by porras 2011-10-05Rated with
by porras 2011-10-05Comment was removed by admin
Rated with
by dannyj 2011-10-05Rated with
by dannyj 2011-10-05This is very bad English and doesnt read properly my apologies if it isnt but it looks like a spun document
Rated with
by cm3208708 2011-10-05The construction and verbiage used does not coomunicate with an American audience
Rated with
by steelbone 2011-10-04Was hoping for a better article...I hired a specific writer...not sure how this person was chosen to write my article...
Rated with
by zmikez 2011-10-04Well written article!
Rated with
by jhigg245 2011-10-04very poorly written....
Rated with
by pwg123 2011-10-04The grammar does not make sense in a lot of cases and the sentences do not always make sense either.
Rated with
by dreamsteward 2011-10-04doesn't read smoothly
Rated with
by dreamsteward 2011-10-04Rated with
by porras 2011-10-04Thanks
Rated with
by thetaxxpert 2011-10-04This article in terms of comprehension is a little better than the previous 4 I rejected. However, it still does not make sense according to sentence structure, therefore I have to reject this article and have it redone.
Rated with
by statoy 2011-10-04