Ratings for writer surenmarkos

Real name
Username
Suren Markos
surenmarkos
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by solutions 2012-06-18 for Article: Pest control review
Barely acceptable. 500 words exactly, and by the time I have corrected the factual errors and the English errors, it will be reduced to around 350 words. 

Rated with 
  by cocomary77 2012-06-17 for Article: Stay at home mom jobs
the writer does not follow the instructions given, only primary keyword was used for the writing. Moreover no professional tone contained for the article. Lastly the writer does not edit the article for paragraphing, grammar etc.  
Responded with comment: We will take care of this Sir.
 

Rated with 
  by goldengirl 2012-06-17 for Article: Slimming body wraps
Few typing issues but nothing that cannot be sorted pretty quickly. 

Rated with 
  by bhavanipreet 2012-06-14 for Article: Which is the Best Internet Service Provider
Thanks
 

Rated with 
  by sadakura 2012-06-13 for Article: 100dayloans.com scam ?
 

Rated with 
  by artmarks 2012-06-12 for Article: In home daycare (tips for parents about home daycare, where to look for home daycare?
good 

Rated with 
  by ethan_kent 2012-06-11 for Article: Hotel
Thanks! 

Rated with 
  by rodgerswriter 2012-06-10 for Article: The Health and Safety at Work Act And What It Involves:
poor grammar 

Rated with 
  by cg5000 2012-06-06 for Article: Philanthropy, community, Denver, small businesses
Reading it, it doesn't make sense. Random thoughts with no fluidity. 

Rated with 
  by elaine.mesina 2012-06-04 for Article: Personal Loans Singapore
I thought this was an impressive article because of the LSIs. But when I started to read it, this will require too much editing on my side. Sorry! 

Rated with 
  by jesus_story 2012-06-04
Not a buyer's guide. Someone who already wants to buy does not need to be told what golf is and why he needs a rangefinder. 

Rated with 
  by keithstauffer 2012-06-03
not very well written. no paragraphs? 

Rated with 
  by pinohu 2012-06-03
Illogical introductory statements. 

Rated with 
  by digitaldanny 2012-06-03
Great article. 

Rated with 
  by madhutechn 2012-06-02
Poorly written 

Rated with 
  by backinthegays 2012-05-31
Not able to use. 

Rated with 
  by tdwilliams33 2012-05-31
 

Rated with 
  by ubet168 2012-05-31
 

Rated with 
  by bigkongz 2012-05-29
extremely poor. dont' write english. 

Rated with 
  by adiaho 2012-05-28
The material does not flow. It is not reader friendly. 

Rated with 
  by DieselViper 2012-05-28
Plagiarized!! 

Rated with 
  by JohnDoner 2012-05-28
Article in English. the job is for a french article 

Rated with 
  by kalillen 2012-05-27
great content but do you have a better title? 

Rated with 
  by mhagens 2012-05-27
Poor grammar. 

Rated with 
  by nittygritty 2012-05-27
The article should be about personal training 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 

Copyright 2011-2014 iWriter.com