Ratings for writer surenmarkos
 |
Real name Username |
surenmarkos |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by solutions 2012-06-18 for Article: Pest control reviewBarely acceptable. 500 words exactly, and by the time I have corrected the factual errors and the English errors, it will be reduced to around 350 words.
Rated with
by cocomary77 2012-06-17 for Article: Stay at home mom jobsthe writer does not follow the instructions given, only primary keyword was used for the writing. Moreover no professional tone contained for the article. Lastly the writer does not edit the article for paragraphing, grammar etc.
Responded with comment: We will take care of this Sir.
Rated with
by goldengirl 2012-06-17 for Article: Slimming body wrapsFew typing issues but nothing that cannot be sorted pretty quickly.
Rated with
by bhavanipreet 2012-06-14 for Article: Which is the Best Internet Service ProviderThanks
Rated with
by sadakura 2012-06-13 for Article: 100dayloans.com – scam ?Rated with
by artmarks 2012-06-12 for Article: In home daycare (tips for parents about home daycare, where to look for home daycare?good
Rated with
by ethan_kent 2012-06-11 for Article: HotelThanks!
Rated with
by rodgerswriter 2012-06-10 for Article: The Health and Safety at Work Act And What It Involves:poor grammar
Rated with
by cg5000 2012-06-06 for Article: Philanthropy, community, Denver, small businessesReading it, it doesn't make sense. Random thoughts with no fluidity.
Rated with
by elaine.mesina 2012-06-04 for Article: Personal Loans SingaporeI thought this was an impressive article because of the LSIs. But when I started to read it, this will require too much editing on my side. Sorry!
Rated with
by jesus_story 2012-06-04Not a buyer's guide. Someone who already wants to buy does not need to be told what golf is and why he needs a rangefinder.
Rated with
by keithstauffer 2012-06-03not very well written. no paragraphs?
Rated with
by pinohu 2012-06-03Illogical introductory statements.
Rated with
by digitaldanny 2012-06-03Great article.
Rated with
by madhutechn 2012-06-02Poorly written
Rated with
by backinthegays 2012-05-31Not able to use.
Rated with
by tdwilliams33 2012-05-31Rated with
by ubet168 2012-05-31Rated with
by bigkongz 2012-05-29extremely poor. dont' write english.
Rated with
by adiaho 2012-05-28The material does not flow. It is not reader friendly.
Rated with
by DieselViper 2012-05-28Plagiarized!!
Rated with
by JohnDoner 2012-05-28Article in English. the job is for a french article
Rated with
by kalillen 2012-05-27great content but do you have a better title?
Rated with
by mhagens 2012-05-27Poor grammar.
Rated with
by nittygritty 2012-05-27The article should be about personal training
