Ratings for writer samreenfarahnaaz
 |
Real name Username |
Samreen Farah Naaz samreenfarahnaaz |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by unknown_zero 1d 0h 7m ago for Article: melbourne body corporate for client satisfactionRated with
by unknown_zero 1d 1h 17m ago for Article: video application for your product or servicesRated with
by unknown_zero 1d 21h 49m ago for Article: healthy diet plans for womenRated with
by unknown_zero 2d 0h 37m ago for Article: vigaplus for better perormanceRated with
by secretzzz 2013-05-12 for Article: 10 Amazingly Cool Homemade CreationsRated with
by ragstoriches 2013-05-11 for Article: Lindsay LohanRated with
by dmshaw 2013-03-03 for Article: Window cleaningpoorly written
Rated with
by MagicHatofMatt 2013-02-27 for Article: Property managementPoor grammar
Rated with
by Pioneered 2013-02-25 for Article: Casement WindowsGood Article, well written and researched
Rated with
by emediaukcom 2013-01-26 for Article: Wrought iron gatesRated with
by hanyhussain 2013-01-18Rated with
by mayateam 2012-12-22Rated with
by informacione 2012-08-04not informative - i dont understand even the aim of this article
Rated with
by esoomllub 2012-06-10Does not even come close to the comparable examples to use as a reference.
Rated with
by Niklec 2012-05-10I didn't like this article.
Rated with
by brianzeng 2012-04-02no title writen
Rated with
by ybati11 2012-03-29A Thousand Thanks For 5 STAR***** Service!!!!!
Rated with
by ybati11 2012-03-29Good Article--just required minor tweaking--not an issue. A Thousand Thanks For 5 STAR***** Service!!!!!
Rated with
by ybati11 2012-03-26Excellent article. However needed to pay closer attention to instructions. Keyword frequency did not comply with request--used too many times. Otherwise would say... A Thousand Thanks For 5 STAR***** Service!!!!!
Rated with
by maczoid 2012-03-05good article, I already have this article already. sorry you missed out the rejection has nothing to do with the quality of your artilce
Rated with
by vanished 2012-03-03Too many word repeats.
Rated with
by onlineconsultant 2012-03-01poorly written article - over spun
Rated with
by mireille 2012-03-01Very original - thank you! Mireille
Rated with
by 866MyMajor 2012-03-01There are some grammar issues. We do not want to edit in any way as the successful writer will be hired to write well over 50 descriptions with a higher payout.
Rated with
by timarticles 2012-03-01Good informative article
