Ratings for writer lilitmarkos
 |
Real name Username |
lilitmarkos |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by djmokoia 2012-05-28Pretty good work. Thanks
Rated with
by b1acker 2012-05-25Rated with
by dumbeedum 2012-05-25This writer obviously didn't bother to research and write. This article is talking about another higher end model the C series codec which is totally different product.
I'm really getting disappointed with the quality. Thanks
I'm really getting disappointed with the quality. Thanks
Responded with comment: asjdf;asjlkd
Rated with
by PingoDotCom 2012-05-21Rated with
by seoweb4545 2012-05-21Rated with
by rebben 2012-05-20Rated with
by hobsdv 2012-05-20Very well written article
Rated with
by Angussurf 2012-05-20Requirements met, sufficient knowledge on subject & very good English
Rated with
by MishaA 2012-05-12Rated with
by markoyqajer 2012-05-12Good Article
Rated with
by markoyqajer 2012-05-12thanks for the article
Rated with
by markoyqajer 2012-05-12Good Writing
Rated with
by markoyqajer 2012-05-12Excellent Work
Rated with
by FixCredit 2012-05-122 thumbs up
Rated with
by jdtate51 2012-05-11Rated with
by lecrawford 2012-05-11Great article and very well written. Thanks
Rated with
by darkvivi 2012-05-10good writer
Rated with
by amykmrw 2012-05-10Rated with
by vard2000 2012-05-10Excellent Article, will hire again
Rated with
by amykmrw 2012-05-10Rated with
by hedgesusa 2012-05-09The copy sounds robotic
Responded with comment: as;djf;aslkjfd
Rated with
by kocasio 2012-05-09Excellent job, thank you!
Rated with
by jayfarrell 2012-05-08Rated with
by jayfarrell 2012-05-07Rated with
by samfred 2012-05-04Very quick reply to request.
Rated with
by Boptom 2012-05-04A lot of the content doesn't make sense.
Responded with comment: Thank you for your feedback
Rated with
by stavros101 2012-05-04Rated with
by darkvivi 2012-05-03Very very good writer
Rated with
by mysmartblog 2012-05-03This is a great article! It is well written and researched accurately. Best article I've got yet!
Rated with
by KM4375 2012-05-02I was looking for actual recipes
Responded with comment: Thank you for your feedback
Rated with
by herbalteam 2012-05-02Responded with comment: Thank you for your feedback
Rated with
by illuminate 2012-05-02Good article. Well written
Rated with
by 4sprung 2012-05-02Writer follows instruction to the detail. Good Quality and well researched article.
Rated with
by steve_austin 2012-04-30poor grammer
Responded with comment: Thanks for your feedback
Rated with
by jayfarrell 2012-04-27Rated with
by illuminate 2012-04-27Good article. Well written.
Rated with
by humphca 2012-04-26this article just does not meet my basic expectations. The content is okay for the topic, but it just doesn't work well with this keyword.
Rated with
by humphca 2012-04-26instructions followed and the article meets my basic standards
Rated with
by Charlie123 2012-04-26Rated with
by csalisbury 2012-04-24The article should have focused on Veneers as indicated in the project.
Responded with comment: Thanks for your feedback
Rated with
by csalisbury 2012-04-24Good writing, but the conclusions about dentists are not accurate.
Rated with
by termit_bronx 2012-04-24Great article, great layout. I really like it. Great job.
Rated with
by benben 2012-04-23this writer doesn't follow my instructions and it seems like he only wrote an article, without SEO in mind
Responded with comment: Thanks for your feedback
Rated with
by josip 2012-04-23Rated with
by newwave 2012-04-22Rated with
by naturiray 2012-04-22obvious grammar mistakes
Rated with
by clwhit12 2012-04-22Well thought out article. Will need some editing to be displayed though.
Rated with
by wea123 2012-04-21Rated with
by blakmk 2012-04-19ok, some grammar issues
Rated with
by rstock 2012-04-19well thought out
