Good
Rated with
by
ivumai 2012-01-10
Rated with
by
ivumai 2012-01-10
Very good article, thank you.
Just for the future keep an eye on the grammar as there are several errors.
But honestly, I like it.... thank you!
There is no up-to-date information within the article.
Also, the keywords appear just twice and is not in the title.
One or two technical points would be very beneficial, or even a some latest news item.
Thanks for your effort.
Paul
Responded with comment: You could have asked me to rewrite it easily by sending me a message, rather than giving a plain one star that makes my rating go down tremendously. There are no errors, and given the nature of my work, it deserves 3 stars at least.
Rated with
by
mylife 2012-01-09
There were many spelling errors and grammer issues existed, the keyword was used too often and the information in the article would not keep the attention of the reader to stay on the web page as the information was too basic knowledge.
Responded with comment: Spelling and grammar errors? Seriously when yourself spell "grammer", you are saying there are spelling and grammar errors? I proofread this article using several software and my own eyes. Writers, avoid this guy!
Good article thanks
very good
Rated with
by
kirk75 2012-01-07
Very good and informative article.
Rated with
by
leca23 2012-01-07
Rated with
by
leca23 2012-01-07
Cool.
Rated with
by
leca23 2012-01-06
EXCELLENT!
Too many grammar mistakes, for the standard I need.
Rated with
by
STKinc 2012-01-05
Good composition small problems with grammar, this vs. these, landmark vs. landmarks, etc.. Very good overall
Rated with
by
STKinc 2012-01-05
Creative, some small problems but overall a good job
i like thank you
awesome articles, thanks
Go to page:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5