Ratings for writer Mercian
 |
Real name Username |
Mark G Mercian |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| Thanks to all of the requesters who've given me the opportunity to work as a writer. And thank you for all the requests I've received. I can only afford to do elite requests. I spend a lot of time doing research for each article I write on this website and elsewhere, so I have to make the best use of my limited time. If you've sent me premium priced requests and I've had to turn them down, I'm very sorry. I will occasionally do premium priced articles if I'm not busy elsewhere; but I cannot guarantee I'll be available. Thanks again, Mark (Mercian). |
||||
Rated with
by powerseller 2012-04-04Very well done again.
Rated with
by powerseller 2012-04-04Excellent Article. Thanks for taking the time to read the requirements.
Rated with
by vladsirius 2012-04-03Rated with
by spikey99 2012-04-03Rated with
by igniter 2012-04-03Rated with
by akelly 2012-04-03Awesome, thanks Mark.
Rated with
by AudioRox 2012-04-02This works great! Thanks! Sorry about the instructions, I had them a little backwards, but I can totally use this article just the same.
Rated with
by akelly 2012-04-02Rated with
by informm 2012-04-01Thank you. I appreciate that you had another go at this article.
Rated with
by dominick10 2012-04-01Good
Rated with
by UKdave 2012-04-01Rated with
by protegra 2012-04-01Grammar issues and too frequent use of the keyword. Not satisifed with writing style.
Responded with comment: What a time waster. My articles were both fine, both took a lot of effort. He left me one stars for both. Total gimp.Usually I find these people use the articles, or parts of them anyway.Beware.
Rated with
by piotrek 2012-04-01Rated with
by protegra 2012-03-31Some run on sentences and paragraphs with one sentence in it. Overall, the article was not up to my standards and the quality of the content was mediocre.
Responded with comment: Why give it one star, the article had good grammer, was well researched and took two hours, yet you trash my rating? Why?
Rated with
by deames 2012-03-31it is the first time i have used iwriter for my articles and i am going to use this writter again as i am more than happy with his work and do recommend.
thank you
thank you
Rated with
by superbec1 2012-03-31Rated with
by robbye@mindspring.com 2012-03-31Thank you. Great Job
Rated with
by psierra 2012-03-30Very informative pillar article. I love your attention to detail as well as the examples and tips given. Very well done.
Rated with
by geotargeted 2012-03-30thanks!
Rated with
by daiseym 2012-03-30Followed brief well, great stuff
Rated with
by ecoleso 2012-03-30Rated with
by ecoleso 2012-03-30Rated with
by macostello 2012-03-30Wow! A fantastic article - thank you very much!
Rated with
by informm 2012-03-29good article - although 1/4 is a bit unusable - when asked to write about successful green buildings, saying "its green credentials cannot be taken seriously at this time. It may not even see construction."
Rated with
by scon66 2012-03-29