Ratings for writer Levonmarkos
 |
Real name Username |
Levonmarkos |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by ventitre 2012-09-24 for Article: Relieve the past and enjoy the future through contemporary applied artstoo much rereference to odart which could be counterproductive with google algorithms and also mistakes in names of companies
Rated with
by zkyclear 2012-07-19 for Article: Earning BIG from your home!!Not follow my instructions
Rated with
by djibril_soul 2012-07-14 for Article: Raw feedingThanks for your efforts.
Rated with
by geoffmccabe 2012-07-14 for Article: A day in the life of an office cleanerThis article has nothing to do with the subject matter. The writer must have cut-and-paste the wrong article into the window! I'm giving it 3-stars because it's well-written, but it's not the right content.
Rated with
by ilainie 2012-07-14 for Article: rainforests of BorneoWell researched and well written. Thank you!
Rated with
by djparnell 2012-07-12 for Article: Poor grammar.
Rated with
by phoenixman 2012-07-11 for Article: English is terrible.
Responded with comment: Thank you for your feedback
Rated with
by firstinkjets 2012-07-11 for Article: Epson inkjet printers are safe and economicaldidnt read well
Responded with comment: Thank you for your feedback
Rated with
by firstinkjets 2012-07-10 for Article: The Best Inkjet Printerspoor english
Responded with comment: Thank you for your feedback
Rated with
by mdanial6 2012-07-10 for Article: Top Ten Application for Samsung Galaxy S3the article is good.
Rated with
by amykmrw 2012-07-10Rated with
by cg5000 2012-07-09Enough here to work. Decent job. Thx
Rated with
by zmbmatt 2012-07-05Great article
Rated with
by deliverabilities 2012-06-27Rated with
by juanzitosv 2012-06-25Great review article, talented writer!
Rated with
by Jlambo44 2012-06-24got it
Responded with comment: ok
Rated with
by ondemandmg 2012-06-24content is bull crap
Responded with comment: ok
Rated with
by vgailrocks 2012-06-23Grammar is not good. Sounds mechanical and not humanly written. There is no flow to this article with little informative content.
Responded with comment: In this case I did not feel that the article was as mechanical as stated.
But i except your judjment
But i except your judjment
Rated with
by chrisen 2012-06-23Would require too much editing.
Responded with comment: Shame on you
Rated with
by cray10 2012-06-23we've retained a writer for the articles
Rated with
by sotiro123 2012-06-22You are clearly not a native English speaker.
Responded with comment: we will work on it
Rated with
by sotiro123 2012-06-22Poor quality
Responded with comment: we will work on it
Rated with
by shineybubbles 2012-06-22too promotional for ASUS
Responded with comment: we will work on it
Rated with
by ebrunssr 2012-06-21To mechanical in explanation
Responded with comment: we will work on it
Rated with
by nickstrech 2012-06-19Badly written article
Responded with comment: we will work on it
Rated with
by ggpaul 2012-06-19Good article but not what I wanted. Grammar is a bit off.
Rated with
by webplus 2012-06-18Australian article, not us
Responded with comment: sorry we will try to get things better
Rated with
by Seagull54 2012-06-1795% of business owners don't create a budget. The article was to focus on this, talking about cost and performance measures. Well written, do have another go if you wish.
Responded with comment: we will work on it
Rated with
by hadewo 2012-06-16great
Rated with
by jfabate 2012-06-08Nice job on this article!
Rated with
by article inc 2012-06-07Your content is impressive, but your grammar is not. I'm sorry, but I cannot afford to spend the amount of time it will take to proof this article for grammar mistakes.
Rated with
by rncaba 2012-06-04Article was not about the subject provided. Looking for a more versed writer. Sorry.
Rated with
by pinohu 2012-06-04Awesome!
Rated with
by arfrancis 2012-06-03well written and factual. Thank you.
Rated with
by davebrown419 2012-06-02great writing
Rated with
by phil647 2012-05-31Article guidelines not followed properly.
Responded with comment: sorry we will try to get things better
Rated with
by ewoauseo 2012-05-24REALLY I DON'T LIKE THE ARTICLE, SORRY
Responded with comment: sorry we will try to get things better
Rated with
by niche2727 2012-05-24Poor grammar.
Responded with comment: sorry we will try to get things better
Rated with
by ubet168 2012-05-24Rated with
by Nitsud7 2012-05-23Not quite a sales page - but good English and grammar.
Rated with
by cpkckaren 2012-05-21This review is no use as it is now. I need 1 700 review for each machine. Please write a full 700 word review on the Emeril by T-fal OW5005001.
You will need to be specific on the features, & informal & friendly in your writing style
You will need to be specific on the features, & informal & friendly in your writing style
Responded with comment: sorry we will try to get things better
Rated with
by u086795 2012-05-21good job.
Rated with
by shpsrv48 2012-05-21poor content
Responded with comment: sorry we will try to get things better
Rated with
by mikelinley 2012-05-20Thanks
Rated with
by taxlienpro 2012-05-20Rated with
by taxlienpro 2012-05-20Rated with
by letmein 2012-05-17Rated with
by baaltazar 2012-05-17not what asked for
Rated with
by empoweredh 2012-05-17Rated with
by davisbrian1974 2012-05-14