Rated with
by
magiccontent 2012-11-21 for
Article:
Home Interior Designer Adds Charm and Sparkle to Your Old Home
too many grammar mistakes - spun generated. sorry but can't accept this.
Rated with
by
graememk2 2012-09-22 for
Article:
Thank you letter to a teacher
great article, thanks very much
good article
Rated with
by
bradmt 2012-09-15 for
Article:
The Art of Psychic Healing
Looks good basic but good
Rated with
by
PeterLikesIt 2012-09-14 for
Article:
The Unique COPD Diagnosis Codes 490-496
Rated with
by
stefffff 2012-08-25 for
Article:
Top 10 Technology Discoveries in 2012
i didn't ask for article rewriting from other websites, i asked for unique articles regarding technology breakthroughs...thanks
Rated with
by
KM4375 2012-08-09 for
Article:
How to Photograph Cars - A Beginners Guide
Rated with
by
raul87 2012-08-07 for
Article:
Remove Skin Tags Safely and Easily At Home
Rated with
by
kiku747 2012-08-03 for
Article:
Legal Process Server - A Brief Summary
Rated with
by
Quidditch 2012-08-03 for
Article:
How many display stands are used per year
Rated with
by
KM4375 2012-07-23
Excellent work on a difficult topic. Definitely added to favorite writers list!
Rated with
by
costaa 2012-07-17
Looks good! Didn't notice any spelling/grammar mistakes which is a pleasant surprise, especially when a lot of writers here on iWriter don't seem to proofread the content they submit.
great
...thxs for the article...good job!..
grammar errors
this is not what i expected
Thanks a lot!
Not well written
Responded with comment: Thank you. Please do not use it. If I find out I might sue you.
God bless you.
Not too bad! Could you please just tidy up the grammatical errors a bit? Then we'll be on our way.
Rated with
by
UUOInc 2012-06-21
Awesomeness. Over delivered here and I love it
Rated with
by
finman 2012-06-19
Thanks
An excellent piece of work. Well done :)
Very good language, however uneven length of the three parts.
this is poor, yo obviously didn't read the instructions, and it dosent make much seance, wondering why i approved it
Not a terrible article; but there were just too many instances of awkward phrasing and unnatural sentence constructions.
you submitted same article twice and there is a lot of weak english here.
Go to page:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5