Ratings for writer bmuriuki
 |
Real name Username |
bmuriuki |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by cocomary77 2012-06-29 for Article: How to build SEO strategies for businessRated with
by stater 2012-06-25 for Article: PAYDAY LOANS-article is not about the subject in the project title
-article has many grammatical errors
-article seems like it was written by someone who does not speak English fluently
-article has many grammatical errors
-article seems like it was written by someone who does not speak English fluently
Rated with
by jockster 2012-06-23 for Article: Doing SEO after panda updateLooking for better quality articles
Rated with
by jockster 2012-06-23 for Article: Why Buying Links Is Banned in internet marketingLooking for better quality articles
Rated with
by seoquotes 2012-06-22 for Article: Drop Shipping businessDid not make sense in the first 2 paragraphs.
Rated with
by Purple Cow Communications 2012-06-22 for Article: VoIP THE SOLUTION TO SOUTH AFRICA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMGrammatically incorrect. Not useful enough.
Rated with
by mumof4boys 2012-06-13 for Article: Clarisonic MiaRated with
by leeroy1981 2012-06-05 for Article: Superb Property for sale in Brittanygrammar / spelling / sorry
Rated with
by phil118 2012-05-28 for Article: Test photos from digital camera reviewsthanks
Rated with
by bt2007 2012-05-27 for Article: Are you conversant with Diablo 3 character guides?Terrible. Didn't follow instructions at all
Rated with
by fated82 2012-05-25It isn't the kind of content I am looking for. The choice of words doesn't flow well enough.
Rated with
by cliqmarketing 2012-05-25Very poorly written. Grammar is bad I wouldn't know where to begin to fix this article.
Rated with
by rsmarketing 2012-05-24Article was fairly well written but did not educate the reader on what the exam consists of, as was instructed.
Rated with
by siteseer 2012-05-24Different tRim models were not discussed.
Rated with
by 1958johnp 2012-05-24Well written, thankyou.
Rated with
by mayateam 2012-05-24Comment was removed by admin
Rated with
by teamturner 2012-05-24Good article.
Rated with
by eyalindub 2012-05-23Rated with
by hitreturn 2012-05-23Rated with
by paultim71 2012-05-23sorry, but poorly written and didn't follow instructions
Rated with
by stevenraj 2012-05-22Introduction is good but sounds as if I read it several times!..I didn't ask to focus on upcoming Olympics in London, I appreciate it though..On a whole the content is simple and good. If it passes our adv plagiarism tool, I'll add to my favorites :)
Rated with
by GoldSand Digital 2012-05-22There are errors in grammer and statements that aren't backed up with strong enough evidence. There aren't any links to where the statistcs were sourced which is essential.
There are random references to locations such as London, Should be UK wide
There are random references to locations such as London, Should be UK wide
Rated with
by SteveM 2012-05-22Thank you for following my instructions.
Rated with
by akinyijoyce 2012-05-21Rated with
by akinyijoyce 2012-05-21