Ratings for writer Sanika
 |
Real name Username |
Sanika Nirgudkar Sanika |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| I am a freelance writer with a good experience in writing on various niche. I love writing on health, fitness, food, drink, travel and human relationships. I believe in writing original content, which touches the hearts of readers. | ||||
Rated with
by perky8226 2012-05-19Thanks
Mike
Mike
Rated with
by joaffiliate 2012-05-19great work, thanks!
Rated with
by phil647 2012-05-18Good article. Bit repetitive in some places. Can only get better. Thanks!
Rated with
by phil647 2012-05-18Good article. Can improve flow next time.
Rated with
by therina 2012-05-17i love this article, except the part where you treat eczema with the sun? can u please repair this paragraph with another point related to the topic pls. u dont have to change the other paragraphs.
Rated with
by phil647 2012-05-17Well researched and written article. Thanks!
Rated with
by Arenne33 2012-05-16Thank you
Rated with
by AmielJaven 2012-05-16Good, but writer did not follow the instruction:
entire article must mention the target keyphrase 10 times, but should not affect the natural sounding
entire article must mention the target keyphrase 10 times, but should not affect the natural sounding
Rated with
by rollingthunder 2012-05-15good subject matter... but we are not in need of your style of writing for this project. Thank you for your efforts.
Robert
PS~ (15-keywords/ 500-words) X 100 = 0.03 X 100 > 3% density....
Robert
PS~ (15-keywords/ 500-words) X 100 = 0.03 X 100 > 3% density....
Rated with
by fireflamespitter 2012-05-15Excellent quality
Rated with
by devcfc 2012-05-11Rated with
by dencha 2012-05-11Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks!
Rated with
by zkyclear 2012-05-09Rated with
by ruditrg 2012-05-08Good writing, flow naturally and follow the instruction
Rated with
by rwiz20 2012-05-05Work done as specified.
Rated with
by stavros101 2012-05-04Rated with
by phwhitley 2012-05-04great job - thank you!
Rated with
by techbay233 2012-05-03good but not what was expected.
Rated with
by tylerherman 2012-05-03Rated with
by bubba2010 2012-05-02not what I'm looking for
Rated with
by tbgseo 2012-05-01While the article will require some editing, it is fairly well-written and detailed.
Rated with
by Neiltrino 2012-04-30Not bad, but article did not read logically. Some of the english used was not used at the right place thus cannot take this article
Rated with
by andrewturner 2012-04-30Not what I'm looking for. I only want an article focused on the symptoms. Not about the condition.
Rated with
by jwsatman 2012-04-26Good article thank you
Rated with
by bhzmr1 2012-04-25Except a few grammar mistakes, the overall article is good and well researched. Thanks.
