Ratings for writer sweta89
 |
Real name Username |
sweta agarwal sweta89 |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by rustyngulube 2012-08-06 for Article: Web Design In South AfricaThe article was written in a format for article submission whereas I want to put the article on my website. The grammar is not right in some sections.
Rated with
by stevie27 2012-06-04 for Article: Raspberry Slimyou mention increase the metabolism to many times!! and your not really giving a review of the product raspberry slim???
Rated with
by stevie27 2012-06-04 for Article: ThermofuelRated with
by hhayman 2012-06-03 for Article: Sprained Ankle RecoveryA couple of grammar errors, but otherwise a decent article
Rated with
by SammyJayJay 2012-06-02 for Article: ECHINACEASorry, too many instances of bad grammar
Responded with comment: I don't think it was bad for rejection
Rated with
by nickbielawski 2012-06-02 for Article: Golf Lessons:Rated with
by ddrum05 2012-06-02 for Article: Introduction: How Food and Exercise influence your moodRated with
by VitaRank 2012-05-29 for Article: Free BetsThanks
Rated with
by mayateam 2012-05-29 for Article: Child CareRated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06 for Article: Kuvings Centrifugal JuicerGood work ad delivered quickly. Thanks
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06NIcely written article.
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06Good article.
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06Good work.
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06Good article
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06Well done!
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06Good article. Just what I was looking for.
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06Well written. Thanks!
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06Good Work
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-05-06Good work. Just what I asked for.
Rated with
by wdbbizness 2012-04-29Sentence structure not good. keyword was for "woodworking plans for beginners" , not "woodworking for the beginners". In the SEO world, this matters. Not up to my standards...thank you
Responded with comment: okay
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-04-29Thanks for doing such a good job. Thanks!
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-04-29Just what I asked for. Good Job!
Rated with
by Acurtin 2012-04-28Well done. Going to save as a favorite writer!
Rated with
by castironsolutions 2012-04-26Rated with
by shineybubbles 2012-04-26Great! Thanks!
Rated with
by devcourt 2012-04-26Rated with
by GODOVERYOU 2012-04-25Rated with
by cosmic 2012-04-25Rated with
by marcovan 2012-04-25Rated with
by myslyn375 2012-04-253 stars for giving great effort!! The article just didnt jump out at me, I like how informative it was and I already have an article similar to this where it states all the facts pretty much. Thank you anyways, I certainly appreciate it.
Rated with
by Niklec 2012-04-24I dont like the article
Responded with comment: okay
Rated with
by josmos 2012-04-24not relevant
Responded with comment: okay
Rated with
by izoten 2012-04-24Rated with
by teerawat14 2012-04-23Rated with
by neilcoleman78 2012-04-22Its bike game, not car game
Responded with comment: okay
Rated with
by hameem 2012-04-22Rated with
by Seosally 2012-04-22Ok great Thanks
Rated with
by tuckery 2012-04-22Rated with
by tuckery 2012-04-22Rated with
by kwdone 2012-02-21Poor sentence and paragraph structure.
Too much paraphrasing
Direct quotes used from previously written articles on the internet
Misinformation included or not supported by varifiable references.
Too much paraphrasing
Direct quotes used from previously written articles on the internet
Misinformation included or not supported by varifiable references.
Responded with comment: okay
Rated with
by pjjackson 2012-02-21The level of english is not good enough
Responded with comment: okay
Rated with
by pjjackson 2012-02-20Rated with
by Ryken01 2012-02-19Rated with
by brianmadden87 2012-02-19thank you
Rated with
by ronnyg43 2012-02-16The writer is good and only had to correct 2 items...I might use again.
Rated with
by Paul_Smith 2012-02-15Good article
Rated with
by wrap462 2012-02-14Good job. Thank you.
Rated with
by evanrvd 2012-02-13Rated with
by stevem01 2012-02-13Godd enough for my purposes. Thanks.
Rated with
by rsoltero 2012-02-13Specifically focus on how regulatory requirements for a traditional small molecule program differs from a non traditional program. Needs to mention oligos nucleotides and/or RNA DNA drugs as these are classic examples of non traditional drugs.
Responded with comment: thanku
