Ratings for writer meelaii
 |
Real name Username |
Melissa Ortiz meelaii |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by HK_World 2012-02-28Thank you for writing the article that I requested.
Rated with
by tanyacarrington67 2012-02-28Rated with
by TechSense 2012-02-27content doesn't make sense
Rated with
by TechSense 2012-02-26Rated with
by relsol1 2012-02-26good article
Rated with
by jwsatman 2012-02-26great piece of work
Rated with
by kilfeatherm@btinternet.com 2012-02-25Rated with
by johnwey 2012-02-24Rated with
by chriscarter 2012-02-24Rated with
by bubsngrubs 2012-02-23Rated with
by TechSense 2012-02-21Rated with
by jhigg245 2012-02-21very well done! just what I wanted
Rated with
by humphca 2012-02-20Thanks for the article. Good work as usual.
Rated with
by edenhpg 2012-02-20Comment was removed by admin
Responded with comment: It would have been better if you provided better and clearer instructions next time. The minimal error does not justify the one-star rating since the link can be easily edited.
Rated with
by nibin_blessy 2012-02-18Good!!
Rated with
by mycommerce 2012-02-16nice work - as always - thanks!
Rated with
by hj@3eyegroup.com 2012-02-14Rated with
by relsol1 2012-02-14good article
Rated with
by jhigg245 2012-02-13well done.
Rated with
by vgonsalv 2012-02-13I noticed several grammatical errors.
Rated with
by hj@3eyegroup.com 2012-02-12Rated with
by guilloch 2012-02-12Rated with
by mycommerce 2012-02-09very nice job - thanks ;-)
Rated with
by deehotom 2012-02-08Rated with
by HeaveN 2012-02-07Rated with
by tfbpa1 2012-02-06Rated with
by leah50 2012-02-06Very good article. The writer put some thought into constructing it.
Paragraphs were well laid out, and the keyword phrase was in the right places. I hope to have other articles written by this writer in the future.
Paragraphs were well laid out, and the keyword phrase was in the right places. I hope to have other articles written by this writer in the future.
Rated with
by humphca 2012-02-06Thanks again!
Rated with
by humphca 2012-02-06Thanks!
Rated with
by mcleod5065 2012-02-06did not read well
Rated with
by humphca 2012-02-05Thank you.
Rated with
by humphca 2012-02-05Thank you for the solid article. Instructions followed well and I am happy with the result.
Rated with
by webular 2012-02-03Rated with
by mikelinley 2012-02-01Thanks
Rated with
by linebelowdigital 2012-01-31good job. thanks.
Rated with
by textrapublishing 2012-01-31Research was fairly well done. The article could have been more well-organized and required some editing but was of acceptable quality.
Rated with
by Kenman 2012-01-30Thanks
Rated with
by textrapublishing 2012-01-29Rated with
by evergreengirl 2012-01-26Perfect article. Everything was excellent.
Rated with
by wallyworldwf 2012-01-24Half or more of the article is based on how to make sugar scrub, not the actual project/article title. Please feel free to resubmit the article with more content about the topic.
Rated with
by hj@3eyegroup.com 2012-01-20Rated with
by musepursuits 2012-01-18Well done! Clean, usable English, followed instructions, hope we can work together again!
Rated with
by jkheitz 2012-01-18Nice
Rated with
by henwi02 2012-01-18Rated with
by johnhutson 2012-01-17Well written and does the job. Unfortunately missed the secondary keyword so I will amend it to include that but it was still written to a good standard.
Rated with
by shikiar 2012-01-16Rated with
by chrishaycock 2012-01-16Rated with
by cr00059n 2012-01-15Excellent Article.
Rated with
by tinjin 2012-01-14Pretty good article, but I don't think you ever used the exact keyword. It was a tough one, I know, and this article doesn't really need to be keyword driven, so it is OK this time.
Rated with
by slamy enough 2012-01-14