Ratings for writer seanjost
 |
Real name Username |
sean jost seanjost |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-27Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-27Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-27Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-22Rated with
by abhimanyusab 2012-03-21Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-20Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-20Good article, but the keyword density is less than needed, less than 2%!
Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-20Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-20Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-03-20Rated with
by adminhog 2012-03-14Good works. We are pretty happy with this writer. The only drawback of this writer is
our special instructions are not fully observed when writing the article.
our special instructions are not fully observed when writing the article.
Rated with
by wiseguy 2012-03-12Very well written, follows directions
Rated with
by retirenow 2012-03-04Another great job by this writer
Rated with
by ctuck26 2012-03-02Overall a good job. A few minor syntax errors, but would be happy to use this writer again.
Rated with
by shafferb1 2012-03-02Rated with
by youell 2012-03-01Rated with
by sr2884 2012-02-27A few errors in the information but I can work with it
Rated with
by jevonhayter 2012-02-17Good Job
Rated with
by jevonhayter 2012-02-16Great Job
Rated with
by The Chaos 2012-02-16You didn't exactly review the game. I want to know what your final verdict is.
Rated with
by jsladream 2012-02-15thank you
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-14thanks
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-14thanks
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-14thanks
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-14Thanks
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-14Grammar
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-13Thanks
Rated with
by csgcsg 2012-02-12Very informative! thank you very much for the effort!
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-10Thanks
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-10Thanks
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-09Thanks
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-09Thanks
Rated with
by 5hrk88 2012-02-04bad readability, some errors in style
Rated with
by jevonhayter 2012-02-04bad grammer
Rated with
by brianzeng 2012-02-02poor typesetting
Responded with comment: olori ibu ni e
Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-02-02Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-02-02Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-02-02Rated with
by jasonqt 2012-02-02Was a good article however didn't follow instructions completely.
Rated with
by spacebar 2012-01-30Rated with
by spacebar 2012-01-30Rated with
by spacebar 2012-01-29only a little work to be done from my side, but it's OK
keep up the good work.
keep up the good work.
Rated with
by spacebar 2012-01-29Please revised the articles, not only had repeated keywords on it. But also meets my listed requirement items #6. Please have some trane hvac reviews (product = trane hvac) !
Responded with comment: wa so fu da nu
Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-01-29Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-01-29Rated with
by MariiaFox 2012-01-29Rated with
by retirenow 2012-01-01Followed instructions and provided a high quality article that can be used on my website.
Rated with
by secretzzz 2011-12-31Rated with
by bugman9317 2011-12-31Rated with
by shafferb1 2011-12-31Poor English grammar
Responded with comment: olori ibu ni e
