Ratings for writer rolling
 |
Real name Username |
Roland Acosta rolling |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by LeydaPBB 2012-02-08 for Article: Puppies for SaleRated with
by binet32 2012-02-07 for Article: Oahu FishingSome grammar errors, but overall nice.
Rated with
by trevord92 2012-02-07 for Article: Manipulative PsychologyOverall didn't read too well. A couple of the sentences were just lists with commas to separate the items.
Rated with
by ivan83 2012-02-02 for Article: big g cereal couponsGreat job
Rated with
by affiliatelabel 2012-02-01 for Article: Best Web Host for Wordpressgood
Rated with
by mtitania 2012-01-31 for Article: Inbound Marketing is not only BloggingToo much slang used. Not very focused.
Rated with
by SamanthaSmith 2012-01-31 for Article: Grizzly ToolsIt looks like a normal thing to write: "RRRRRRRRRRRRRRummmmmmBBBBBBBLLLLEEEEEEE" in a post?
Rated with
by jaegerlc 2012-01-23 for Article: I Cut Off the Flowering Branch...NOW WHAT?Well done. Thank you so much! This is exactly what we were looking for.
Rated with
by vostrader 2012-01-21 for Article: Corporate Travel ManagementNot really about the topic, spammy without any useful content for the reader
Rated with
by clickhereltd 2012-01-19 for Article: Learn About Lands End CouponsRated with
by yourlinkguru 2012-01-18Added links to competitors
Not talked anything not even a single line about lasik
instead keeps repeating that watching superbowl can damage eyes
Not talked anything not even a single line about lasik
instead keeps repeating that watching superbowl can damage eyes
Rated with
by synergisticlabs 2012-01-16Rated with
by bcalling23 2012-01-12Nice job.
Rated with
by belgradetaxi 2012-01-10Rated with
by BruceB 2012-01-05Rated with
by levanchik 2012-01-03I'm sorry that I have to reject but you didn't use keywords at all, only once at the bottom of the article.
Rated with
by ermizz 2012-01-02Rated with
by Blogertize 2011-12-29This article is too general and vague. The writer did not seem to be writing from experience as requested. The writing is weak.
Responded with comment: Good article.
Rated with
by snow90 2011-12-28Super!
Rated with
by petespete 2011-12-21Thank you
Rated with
by fullmonty 2011-12-14Very good
Rated with
by fullmonty 2011-12-14Okey
Rated with
by fullmonty 2011-12-14it will do
Rated with
by fullmonty 2011-12-14fine
Rated with
by RacAllen 2011-12-14Thanks
Go to page: 1, 2
