Ratings for writer Rock Dsouza
 |
Real name Username |
Rock Dsouza rockester |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
| Hi, I am Rock Dsouza, I have been writing for a while now. Previously almost all my articles have been approved by my clients and they seemed pretty much satisfied with them. I write cause it is one of my hobbies! | ||||
Rated with
by neuewavemedia 2013-04-12 for Article: Choosing From The Right SEO Packages.Rated with
by neuewavemedia 2013-04-12 for Article: Professional SEO Services.poor wording, does not read well
Rated with
by Writemesomething 2013-04-02 for Article: Enjoy Minecraft For free!thx nice info - maybe you can write a more unique title next time?
Rated with
by johnblidas 2013-03-31 for Article: The Best Walk Around Lens for your Digital Camera!Good article
Rated with
by Writemesomething 2013-03-22 for Article: Two simple ways of playing minecraft for free!5 stars for the extra words. Few repeats and few spelling errors
Rated with
by Writemesomething 2013-03-15 for Article: Minecraft Mods - Change the way you play!decent, overuse of keywords and repeats tho.
Rated with
by Writemesomething 2013-03-14 for Article: Minecraft Skins - Way to make it more fun!Did you read instructions? The keyword appear like twice per sentence, it almost looks like spam.
Im still approving it and adjusting it myself tho.
Im still approving it and adjusting it myself tho.
Rated with
by Writemesomething 2013-03-10 for Article: Get your Minecraft for free!Very nice article, maybe a bit too general info, and a bit of repeats.
Hope you can write more articles for me?
Hope you can write more articles for me?
Rated with
by neuewavemedia 2013-03-07 for Article: SEO Companies – All you need to know.Rated with
by MBaltazar 2012-12-08 for Article: Makita LXFD03Z - The Power tool.Bad use of commas. Grammatical errors.
Rated with
by Boptom 2012-04-16Poor grammar and poorly formatted.
Rated with
by delashmate 2012-04-14The article is not focused on it's subject.
Rated with
by floshow25 2012-04-13Article was well-written and comprehensive
Rated with
by longleyr 2012-04-08some of this just doesn't make any sense.
Responded with comment: Yah aight, you could have come up with a better excuse than that lol.
Rated with
by asterixia 2012-03-25Rated with
by raybse 2012-03-25Very Good keep up the good work.
Rated with
by kbtalent 2012-03-24Rated with
by bellum30 2012-03-09I would use this writer again. He has a pretty good writing style but needs to check his diction more closely. I have found a few grammatical errors and misused words. i suspect english is a second language.
Rated with
by outofthebox 2012-03-06Rated with
by esoomllub 2012-03-05Just not a good article. No flow, weird terminology, weak grammar at best, hard to read
Responded with comment: It is kinda hard to keep a decent flow or terminology with the weird keyword you provided. your expectations are pretty high for a 2$ article and with almost no specific instructions. Good luck.
Rated with
by mikelinley 2012-03-03Thanks
Rated with
by asterixia 2012-03-01Rated with
by nico7980 2012-02-28bad grammar
Rated with
by Budget101 2012-02-24Good attempt by an author who has NO knowledge of the industry. Sorry, we are unable to use the article as the information is not correct.
Rated with
by Berkinb 2012-02-24