Ratings for writer aamwema
 |
Real name Username |
Angela Mwema aamwema |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by Franka1105 2013-01-03Thank you
Rated with
by CreativeOil 2013-01-03Rated with
by coby8740 2013-01-02Very nice article! Thank you.
Rated with
by Franka1105 2013-01-02thank you Angela, really appreciate your style
Rated with
by shaffique 2012-12-28Rated with
by badmab 2012-12-25Looks good. Thanks.
Rated with
by mossie786 2012-12-25many thanks
Rated with
by colin_t 2012-12-23guidelines not respected
Responded with comment: Very hard to understand what he wants. May not work for him again.
Rated with
by goldstarlock 2012-12-23Rated with
by waltzingmathile 2012-12-23Rated with
by waltzingmathile 2012-12-23Rated with
by Deckman 2012-12-22Even flow and very easy to read. Made some valid points that are included in the writing that will make for a very informing read. Even though I allowed up to 1% it was kept below. This allows for easy reading. Great Job!
Rated with
by notionage 2012-12-21Rated with
by teamturner 2012-12-18good article
Rated with
by mikelinley 2012-12-18HORRIBLE AND DID NOT FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS! DO NOT HIRE THIS SCAMMER
Responded with comment: You and I know that I followed your instructions to the letter. But Going ahead to spoil my name for personal reasons is going to far.
Rated with
by mikelinley 2012-12-18HORRIBLE AND NOT UNIQUE BUT SPUN!!! DO NOT HIRE!!!
Responded with comment: If it was spun as you claim or spammed, you should have reported me instead. Spoiling my good name and reputation for nothing is not the right thing to do and you know it.
Rated with
by mikelinley 2012-12-18HORRIBLE AND SPUN GARBAGE! DO NOT HIRE THIS SCAMMER!
Responded with comment: If it was spun as you claim or spammed, you should have reported me instead. Spoiling my good name and reputation for nothing is not the right thing to do and you know it.
Rated with
by nidfat 2012-12-17Wow Good job Thank you
Rated with
by Methodical 2012-12-17Rated with
by coloma21 2012-12-16pretty decent, thanks!
Rated with
by 1digitalmarketing 2012-12-16bad grammer
Responded with comment: ok
Rated with
by leannemordue 2012-12-16Rated with
by socialjoe 2012-12-16Fairly decent article, a few areas of bad english but on the whole it was acceptable. Thanks
Rated with
by jlenney 2012-12-14Thanks!!
Rated with
by tamara 2012-12-14Thank you!
