Ratings for writer rahildeziner

Real name
Username
raheel khan
rahildeziner
Would you like to ask
this writer a question?
Would you like to have your
article written by this writer?
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by englandrm 2012-02-08
There's a few wrong words used in it, that make it sound like it was just a re-written article, that wasn't proof-read. 

Rated with 
  by Gauher 2012-02-07
 

Rated with 
  by cuppe93215 2012-02-07
Thanks 

Rated with 
  by samarticles 2012-02-07
Thanks for the nice article. 

Rated with 
  by samarticles 2012-02-06
Great article, thank you so much! 

Rated with 
  by jhigg245 2012-02-06
very broken English.  

Rated with 
  by wunginch 2012-02-06
 

Rated with 
  by m150bisa 2012-02-04
Whole readings are fine...still need subtitle between the articles...anyway, nice article..thx. 

Rated with 
  by thailanddave 2012-02-04
Nice Job 

Rated with 
  by Richierobb 2012-02-04
Prretty good writinig, however, article contains numbersous typos. 

Rated with 
  by mitstacia 2012-02-04
Many errors in the article hard to read.  

Rated with 
  by jstand 2012-02-04
some spacing and grammar issues 

Rated with 
  by edlange 2012-02-03
Not focused on what I require 

Rated with 
  by efactory 2012-02-03
 

Rated with 
  by sveisko 2012-02-03
Not according to my specification. Keyword not used in first sentence, nor last. I also requested 2 subheadings with the keywords - no subheadings where used in the article. 

Rated with 
  by jevonhayter 2012-02-02
bad grammer 

Rated with 
  by affiliatelabel 2012-02-02
ok 

Rated with 
  by syoung 2012-02-02
bad grammar 

Rated with 
  by gtgart 2012-02-01
Poorly written. Please try again. 

Rated with 
  by midas25 2012-01-31
sorry didnt like article ,poor english and some html in the sentances 

Rated with 
  by 2012-01-31
 

Rated with 
  by Hermione 2012-01-31
Great article, thanks 

Rated with 
  by Hermione 2012-01-31
Good article, thanks 

Rated with 
  by brianzeng 2012-01-27
poor quality 

Rated with 
  by jsalter 2012-01-26
bad grammar 

Rated with 
  by evergreengirl 2012-01-26
This article was okay. A couple of grammar errors I will correct but the research and information presented was good. 

Rated with 
  by shanemackintosh 2012-01-26
Poor English. 

Rated with 
  by oksana.petrovic@gmail.com 2012-01-26
 

Rated with 
  by smacgavin 2012-01-25
Thanks 

Rated with 
  by affiliatelabel 2012-01-25
great 

Rated with 
  by eltsafon 2012-01-25
 

Rated with 
  by anislagan 2012-01-24
 

Rated with 
  by pageviews 2012-01-24
 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2, 3
 

Copyright 2011-2013 iWriter.com