There's a few wrong words used in it, that make it sound like it was just a re-written article, that wasn't proof-read.
Rated with
by
Gauher 2012-02-07
Thanks
Thanks for the nice article.
Great article, thank you so much!
very broken English.
Whole readings are fine...still need subtitle between the articles...anyway, nice article..thx.
Nice Job
Prretty good writinig, however, article contains numbersous typos.
Many errors in the article hard to read.
Rated with
by
jstand 2012-02-04
some spacing and grammar issues
Not focused on what I require
Not according to my specification. Keyword not used in first sentence, nor last. I also requested 2 subheadings with the keywords - no subheadings where used in the article.
bad grammer
ok
Rated with
by
syoung 2012-02-02
bad grammar
Rated with
by
gtgart 2012-02-01
Poorly written. Please try again.
sorry didnt like article ,poor english and some html in the sentances
Great article, thanks
Good article, thanks
poor quality
bad grammar
This article was okay. A couple of grammar errors I will correct but the research and information presented was good.
Poor English.
Thanks
great