Rated with
by
jamilyap 17h 14m ago for
Article:
Corporate Tax Returns in Brampton
Rated with
by
abhimanyusab 1d 16h 44m ago for
Article:
How to Choose the Right Tripod
Rated with
by
kwg2200 2013-05-16 for
Article:
Vinyl Fence Panels
Great job, thanks!
Rated with
by
rodgersbestgen 2013-05-08 for
Article:
Solutions Oriented Costa Rica Marketing
very poor quality
Responded with comment: No reason given for rejection. Just vague "poor quality" which means nothing. Perhaps inability to write an idea is reason requester is unable to decipher between good articles and bad.
Rated with
by
alexseo 2013-05-08 for
Article:
Second Hand Cars for Sale
Have you even read the instructions? I didn't read anything from them. Thank you but I'll pass
Rated with
by
alexseo 2013-05-08 for
Article:
What Do You Need to Know About Netball Equipment
Rated with
by
Kaybull 2013-05-07 for
Article:
New Photocopiers offer impressive, cost saving new technology
Many thanks. Informative and reads well apart from second to last paragraph starting "while the abilities...." but easily fixed.
Rated with
by
tamara 2013-05-07 for
Article:
Ultraviolet Differential Optical Absorption
Thank you!
I liked the writing style and is useful for my purposes. Thanks.
Rated with
by
Grafique 2012-12-19 for
Article:
The Story of Coffee
great job...high quality writing and content
Rated with
by
pragle 2012-05-10
Did a really good job on the article. Thank you!
Rated with
by
josip 2012-04-25
very good thank you.
diyrollup
I am not overly happy with this article as it will need a lot of editing to get it presentable. Seems to be by a writer that is some what knowledgeable of stocks and financial markets though and that is why I am approving it.
Well written and informative. I would like to have more articles by this author. Well done.
Excellent Work
Rated with
by
bmf846 2011-12-20
Overall the article is pretty good. However, the writer didn't follow all of the directions that were provided. There were also a number of run-on sentences.
Great thanks