Ratings for writer originalwriter
 |
Real name Username |
originalwriter |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by gbrooks7 2012-06-12Your articles are much better and the content is great!
Rated with
by gbrooks7 2012-06-12great work.
Rated with
by gbrooks7 2012-06-12great
Rated with
by gbrooks7 2012-06-12good
Rated with
by gbrooks7 2012-06-12loved it, you are getting better every day great work.
Rated with
by gbrooks7 2012-06-12love it, very good article.
Rated with
by seoamp 2012-06-11Rated with
by aromanon 2012-06-11Rated with
by nardolak 2012-06-10Rated with
by wildeagle 2012-06-09The article does not meet the included instructions, thanks very much for the attempt.
Responded with comment: He is no doubt a sure shot article thief. shame on you. shame on you. shame on you.
Rated with
by nadeemc 2012-06-09Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-06-05Thanks
Rated with
by valtran 2012-06-05Good job, on topic and good grammar and spelling.
Rated with
by jevonhayter 2012-06-04great job
Rated with
by rdunnejr 2012-06-04Rated with
by gean82 2012-06-04thank you
Rated with
by haydenweb 2012-06-03Thanks
Rated with
by KEVITO50 2012-06-02The article contained numerous grammatical errors.
Rated with
by caksut 2012-06-01Rated with
by goldrushg 2012-05-31Gramar &Lock sentence structure needs improvement. Not something i would publish as-is.
Rated with
by jpster 2012-05-31Bad grammer and sentence structure
Rated with
by jasonp 2012-05-31Rated with
by teamturner 2012-05-30Good article.
Rated with
by 40under99 2012-05-30Good job
Rated with
by londamedia 2012-05-29