Ratings for writer Arlene McKanic
 |
Real name Username |
Arlene McKanic Arlene McKanic |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by hobblecreek 2012-03-13Rated with
by tmflex 2012-03-13Great work.
Rated with
by slamy enough 2012-03-12Rated with
by carlgerber 2012-03-12Rated with
by chateau 2012-03-12Excellent. Followed Special Instructions very well. Was NOT afraid to complete article logic-flow even if it meant exceeding word count (much appreciated "quality first" focus). Ordering more articles from this writer!
Rated with
by dimitric 2012-03-12thank you
Rated with
by magicsheep 2012-03-11Rated with
by rodav120 2012-03-09Another great job! Informative. Correct English.
Rated with
by vcampagna 2012-03-09great job
Rated with
by rodav120 2012-03-08Well-written!
Rated with
by tempsmort 2012-03-07Rated with
by tpbernard 2012-03-06Very good article.
Rated with
by ccleor 2012-03-05needed a little more profesional in writing and the hydrotherapy part seemed a little weak. maybe i wasn't specific enough, i may have to rethink my request in future.
Rated with
by Silverman 2012-03-05Article is informative and will give value to my readers.
Rated with
by laritaturner 2012-03-03The article should not include actual recipes and measured food items.
Responded with comment: Can't bring up the reason why this one was rejected. Have a feeling that the format was wonky -- was that it? Have a lousy browser -- maybe shouldn't have attempted recipes?
Rated with
by Xhealthusa 2012-03-02very good
Rated with
by girlblackbelt 2012-03-02Good article
Rated with
by rixrytz 2012-02-29Writing is good, with an element of creativity.
Rated with
by chateau 2012-02-19Very nice. Followed Special Instructions well. The turn-around time was incredible! Thank you. More articles to come.
Rated with
by dennisrosenberg 2012-02-19Fast turnaround, good quality.
Rated with
by hantge 2012-02-15great article, just what I needed
Rated with
by binshu 2012-02-14Rated with
by littletanhouse 2012-02-14Allllriiiight...Very well written article with good information for my readers...Thank you...
Rated with
by james@wyndhamventures.com 2012-02-14Rated with
by turmune 2012-02-13Not sure why you included the link to another website.
Rated with
by semplate 2012-02-12Thank you for submitting. I can use this in another project, but not for the one intended. The information was too limited. There are many other reasons that are considered dental emergencies than just the two provided.
Rated with
by joelwong622 2012-02-12Thanks for the great writing.
Rated with
by BoomerMary 2012-02-11This was a great article and I am very picky. I will definitely seek out Arlene again
Thank you an article I can use as is which is something I very much appreciate.
Thank you an article I can use as is which is something I very much appreciate.
Rated with
by psilvola 2012-02-11Excellent article. Thanks.
Rated with
by fselvan2000 2012-02-11It has to be edited further to use in a website, as you said i was waiting for your message with the edited version, unfortunately i didn't get any reply after your first message. Sorry..
Rated with
by Paul_Smith 2012-02-10Good article
Rated with
by littletanhouse 2012-02-06Great content - Thank you...
Rated with
by poobah 2012-02-05Article poorly written. It also had specifics about the topic that made it useless for our purpose.
Responded with comment: Nothing to say.
Rated with
by kaidcorp 2012-02-04Rated with
by gabibeowulf 2012-02-04not bad .. but it's not a good match for my blog. I am looking for something that reads a little smoother than that.
Rated with
by bowechaim 2012-02-04Another well written article! I am grateful I have found such a good writer....
Rated with
by namnek 2012-02-03Rated with
by semplate 2012-02-02Thank you, please keep writing :)
Rated with
by ireani 2012-02-01Good article. Provided the facts I asked for in my description.
Rated with
by rodmacb 2012-02-01Rated with
by namnek 2012-02-01Rated with
by mountainjohn 2012-02-01Had some spelling mistakes at the start of the article. No use of H1 and H2 tags, poor use of keywords. I would have to do a lot of cleaning up this article myself before I could submit.
Responded with comment: Hmm -- sorry for the typos. And I don't know if this program accepts <h2> coding, etc.
Rated with
by cjb508 2012-01-31just what I was looking for...
Rated with
by joshuaaknowles 2012-01-31This writer is simply the best.
Rated with
by joshuaaknowles 2012-01-30spot on!
Rated with
by akelly 2012-01-29Thank for doing so much research, but unfortunately this is not good enough quality for this website. The general information about the fish is great, but the way the work is structured makes it difficult to read and needs work. Thanks again.
Rated with
by joshuaaknowles 2012-01-29Thank you. Missed the call to action at the end of the article but overall great article.
Rated with
by jcssme 2012-01-28Smart use of LSI keywords. Thanks again!
