Ratings for writer adrianwrites
 |
Real name Username |
adrianwrites |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by globalquest 2012-02-11Article was OK but unfortunately a little disjointed and relates more to SEO/blogs than copywriting.
Rated with
by goldmercury 2012-02-11Article looks spun
Responded with comment: NOT recommended at all, gave 1 star and the reason that article looks spun. I'm sorry that I wasted my time with this requester.
Rated with
by karenmariekalata 2012-02-10Thanks for the great work!
Rated with
by Parazitu23 2012-02-09Rated with
by sinsay 2012-02-09Very nice work.Thanks
Rated with
by cronyinfotech 2012-02-09Rated with
by kenlavertu@earthlink.net 2012-02-08Vocabulary issues. Doesnt flow well.
Rated with
by superja 2012-02-08instructions followed
Rated with
by auradev 2012-02-08Very good work
Rated with
by keithdhd 2012-02-07Rated with
by pjjackson 2012-02-07Rated with
by pjjackson 2012-02-07Rated with
by dwcannon 2012-02-06Keyword density was higher than 2% for document, please read special instructions before writing my articles. Good article but I can't use it.
Responded with comment: Learn math bud! keyword density was under 2%...NOT recommended at all, gave 1 start for an unexistent reason!
Rated with
by auradev 2012-02-06fantastic work
Rated with
by luis74 2012-02-05good article exactly what I was looking for
Rated with
by icash7 2012-02-05Proofread your writing before submitting. Read it out loud to make sure there are no grammar mistakes or sentence fragments.
Rated with
by Daz2007 2012-02-05Needs to improve on grammar and punctuation, but article was acceptable.
Rated with
by guilloch 2012-02-05Rated with
by cdixon9 2012-02-04Superb write up!!! would definitely recommend.
Rated with
by leedobbins 2012-02-04Rated with
by frobak 2012-02-04good article thanks
Rated with
by halcyon100 2012-02-04cheers
Rated with
by slleknaes 2012-02-03not professional sounding enough
Rated with
by kasecr 2012-02-03Rated with
by dplawson 2012-02-03Good!
