iWriter - Ratings

Home Get Content Write Content About FAQ Contact Register Login

Ratings for writer bongski

Real name Username	Ernesto Maitim bongski	Would you like to have your article written by this writer?
Overall rating

Rated with

by VitaRank 2012-07-23 for Article: Forex Robot � Most Useful Software Tool for Traders

Rated with

by webunlimited 2012-07-22 for Article: Why Aren't All Cherry Picker Fleets Hybrids?

This article was erroneously released from my assigned writer. I will not approve it under any circumstances as I am tired of dealing with this error. Article is not of the quality the I get from my regular writer.

Rated with

by allanfowler 2012-07-21 for Article: HCG Diet Meal Plan: What You Need to Know

good sentence structure and the flow of points in the article make sense and read well. Thankyou

Rated with

by lifestyleopt 2012-07-20 for Article: Penny Stocks - Scam or Great Investment?

Good Work!

Rated with

by steve.stretton 2012-07-18 for Article: Six Sure Ways of Enjoying Immense Traffic of Instagram Followers

I am sorry. My client has been in touch today and asked that we pull the plug. We no longer need these articles. I am hugely sorry for the inconvineince and hope you can find a home for your great work elsewhere

Rated with

by rarbois 2012-07-18 for Article: Effective Ways of Waterproofing Basement Walls

Very well written article. Good work and will definitely want to work with you soon. Good Job!

Rated with

by rncaba 2012-07-18 for Article: Diablo 3 Gold - Get Tons and Become a Diablo 3 Millionaire

Wrong information included within the article. Few Grammar mistakes as-well. Thanks for trying.

Rated with

by Haboub 2012-07-17 for Article: Teach English in Hong Kong and Add Life to Your Teaching Profession

Rated with

by stanton 2012-07-17 for Article: Take Advantage of Effective Forex Signal Service Providers

Rated with

by elohord 2012-07-16 for Article: The Pitbull Guide - Best eBook on Pitbull Training

Rated with

by jonathannewby 2012-07-16

Well done.

Rated with

by jockster 2012-06-26

Rated with

by sooner3k 2012-06-22

Great job once again! Thanks-Vernon

Rated with

by socialfe 2012-05-28

Poor language

Responded with comment: I already wrote for you 2 similar articles on the same topic (UK insurance), and you approved them both. It just baffles me that you rejected the third one. Talk about inconsistency. Please, please -- be more considerate when rating your writers.

Rated with

by clclester 2012-05-23

Rated with

by iJacky 2012-05-20

It's not the way I want.

Rated with

by guyfromnb 2012-05-18

Very good job. Easy and interesting to read. It flows well.

Rated with

by informm 2012-05-15

Good article. Thank you

Rated with

by Barratts Shoes 2012-05-15

thanks, not bad just needs minor editing

Rated with

by AreaMarketing 2012-05-04

It is close but not really specific to the topic or professional enough

Responded with comment: It's okay that you don't accept it. However, since you said that the article was close, why do you have to give the lowest score, for heaven's sake?

Rated with

by bloommiranda 2012-04-30

Rated with

by socialfe 2012-04-30

thanks

Rated with

by bloommiranda 2012-04-30

Rated with

by bloommiranda 2012-04-30

Rated with

by bloommiranda 2012-04-30

Rated with

by edwardradzyminski 2012-04-29

Rated with

by tucker_sharon 2012-04-29

Rated with

by tucker_sharon 2012-04-29

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-26

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-26

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-26

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-26

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-26

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-25

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-25

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-25

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-25

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-25

Thanks very much

Rated with

by stzabel 2012-04-25

Thanks very much

Rated with

by kian187 2012-04-21

Reads very poor and choppy, unable to use on a high end website.

Responded with comment: Please recheck your instruction. KW on every paragraph of a 6-paragraph, 500-page article. KW as first and last words of article. KW on subtitles. Who would think this is intended for a high-end website? More for SEO purposes, & not for readers.

Rated with

by sooner3k 2012-04-20

Amazing work,my life has improved since I found Bongsky!
Fantastic review article writer,and great at web content as well!
Will be ordering again A.S.A.P.-Vernon

Rated with

by sooner3k 2012-04-19

I hope you don't mind if I hire you for all of my review articles from now on! Will be ordering my next article soon-Vernon

Rated with

by judhogan 2012-04-18

Thanks.

Rated with

by edenhpg 2012-04-18

Rated with

by mcardenal99 2012-04-16

Rated with

by Eliofel 2012-04-15

thats wat i am talking about
well done
thank you

Rated with

by rtwright 2012-04-15

Great article clear and easy to read. Just what I wanted. Will use you again. thanks

Rated with

by dedomraz 2012-04-14

Rated with

by jayestovall 2012-04-14

I like how you laid out the progression of the content from the risk involved without not having the product, to explaining what it is, and how it will help the consumer. Thank you.

Rated with

by sweetfranky 2012-04-14

Show per page: 10 25 50

Go to page: 1, 2, 3