Content is weak and convoluted (a bad combination); if you want to say something simple, use concise language. If you write without regard for the reader's experience, your work doesn't deserve to be published. Words need to inform or entertain. 

 

This article doesn't read any different from the original one. I was exerting you to add a little bit of your own ideas and research to make it read very different from the original article.
It was quite good but not for me.  

 

Thank you for the quick response and quality 

totally missed the point, lot of mistakes 

Thanks 

Thank you for your quick work.  

 

Thank you. Once again, great work! 

 

 

Thanks very much 

 

Happy with result. 

good job 

Really good job nice article  

 

nice job 

Great re-write 

good work  

You have done better work. There is some grammer adjustment that need done but overall good.  

This has been written with very poor grammar and has lots off spelling mistakes most of it doesn't make sense even.  

Responded with comment: Bad spelling? I don't think so. Thanks for nothing though. 

 

 

Good article. Thank you. 

 

Good article 

 

 

 

This was quite good however does not mention key products such as top loading solutions, infeeding systems, wallet packaging machines, system packaging 

Not Grant Writing language. Too informal. Not making a Positive image. No re write requested.
This system also is not great. It is unfair to be forced to rate someone's work that I am not going to utilize. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Was suppose to be submitted for a particular writer. My Apologizes. 

Thanks for the great work! 

not what im looking for