Ratings for writer drdmanohar
 |
Real name Username |
Manohar Dharmanna drdmanohar |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by Techkat 2011-10-05Keyword density not acceptable ("Brazilian Blowout Dangers" doesn't appear a single time).
Rated with
by surasak 2011-10-02Good article
Rated with
by bioeric 2011-10-02Rated with
by tomc2011 2011-10-01Awesome! Thanks!
Rated with
by colgoose 2011-10-01Good
Rated with
by crafty1 2011-09-30Rated with
by edgardo 2011-09-30Rated with
by d1francis 2011-09-30Rated with
by tristlss 2011-09-29Rated with
by brigyxy 2011-09-28You can see the writer did some research on the subject. Great read, clear and correct content. Thanks!
Rated with
by Mike1113 2011-09-28Rated with
by 3710414 2011-09-27Thanks
Rated with
by netbug 2011-09-27Good Article the only thing you missed was the keyword in the first sentence but I can fix that. Thank you for your effort.
Rated with
by elanzen 2011-09-25Good Article.
Rated with
by elanzen 2011-09-25Good Article.
Rated with
by jmarfoglio 2011-09-24thank you . Article was well written , the only thing is I asked for it to be written in the first person. You have to pay attention to the details of the descriptions
Rated with
by prepaid4topup 2011-09-24Rated with
by srmackey 2011-09-23Rated with
by thecreecher 2011-09-23totally missed the point of chemicals
Rated with
by lacollector 2011-09-22Didn't follow instructions
Rated with
by munfaridon 2011-09-22Good writer
Rated with
by sangil.llc 2011-09-21Rated with
by jpownet 2011-09-21Great response time on article request which resulted in a good article.
Rated with
by secretzzz 2011-09-21excellent
Rated with
by danneG27 2011-09-20Rated with
by Techkat 2011-09-20Rated with
by Taylor 2011-09-19Rated with
by vanduyse 2011-09-18not bad article overall, but didn't follow the instructions
Rated with
by ayman01 2011-09-17Rated with
by daddeo 2011-09-17good thx
Rated with
by ts150ts 2011-09-16didnt make 500 words but article is good
Rated with
by Techkat 2011-09-16Well done, thanks.
Rated with
by Secretaffiliate 2011-09-16Rated with
by sherry 2011-09-15Great job!
Rated with
by Shirtmagic 2011-09-15Great Job
Rated with
by iamrichdad 2011-09-12good one
Rated with
by pageplant 2011-09-12errors in words such as "woman".. should be "women" in some areas. Commas are missing where needed
Rated with
by elanzen 2011-09-11Good article.
Rated with
by easthana 2011-09-11Grammatical errors, but I can edit and fix. Good basic article.
Rated with
by JoelBB 2011-09-10Rated with
by elanzen 2011-09-10Good article.
Rated with
by wealthyguardian 2011-09-10The writer got the meat of the keyword down, though the article seemed to end abruptly, and without use of the subject in the project title. With that being said, the good Doctor did the most of the work and research for me, which was VERY MUCH appre
Rated with
by elanzen 2011-09-09Good article.
Rated with
by tntkik 2011-09-09Rated with
by TroyMaclean 2011-09-09Very well written. Top notch.
Rated with
by tristlss 2011-09-07Rated with
by fulleclipse 2011-09-02Awesome Job! If there were a 6th star you would have gotten it.
Rated with
by limskang 2011-09-01Rated with
by tordr86 2011-08-31Sorry, but this article was not what I was looking for. The article was well written otherwise.
Rated with
by tgon1563 2011-08-30Go to page: 1, 2
