Ratings for writer inrwiter_hs1
 |
Real name Username |
inrwiter_hs1 |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by vithounh 2012-02-06Rated with
by Chandana.2708 2012-02-04Rated with
by blythedoll 2012-01-30Rated with
by sparish75 2012-01-22Easy to read article, thanks
Rated with
by rickrivera 2012-01-21Rated with
by richjames 2012-01-21Good work,thanks!
Rated with
by webunlimited 2012-01-20Article was to be about why to plant trees, only 1 paragraph was about this and the rest was about the keyword, i.e. Bryan landscaper, landscaping companies, etc. Need to be all about why to plant trees.
Rated with
by brad08 2012-01-18Rated with
by d60eba 2012-01-16Not too badly written but unfortunately didn't follow what I had written in the special instructions - I specified that the writer should contact me for access details to the course and write a review based on personal experience.
Rated with
by brianzeng 2012-01-13not focus on keyword
Rated with
by TomPritch 2012-01-13Rated with
by oicgroup 2012-01-13Rated with
by usville 2012-01-13Did not like.
Responded with comment: Though, the article hadnt any spelling and grammatical error, its okay because you didnt like it. However, thanks. I enjoyed writing about your site!
Rated with
by usville 2012-01-11Thanks...!!!!
Rated with
by Blogertize 2012-01-10Good story, although actual numerical statistics would have added to the feature. Thanks.
Rated with
by 277websitedesign 2012-01-09Pretty basic. Not natural, but used the keywords well
Rated with
by esynergy 2012-01-08Well done with the article. well researched. grammatical errors nothing too crucial.
Maybe read the article 3 times before sending so it doesn't lower your score.
I Definitely recommend you and hope to work in future with you.
Maybe read the article 3 times before sending so it doesn't lower your score.
I Definitely recommend you and hope to work in future with you.
Rated with
by JenniB 2012-01-06very keyword dense, but a good article
Rated with
by Talzick 2012-01-04Rated with
by sjewson 2012-01-04Very good in places poor in others. But let down in last couple of paragraphs with some basic grammar errors and sentences that don't make sense, seems like it has been written by two different people!
Rated with
by simplesequence 2012-01-02Well researched, but the writing could use some work. It will take a few minutes to fix it up, but that's okay. Thank you!
Rated with
by octavien 2012-01-02Rated with
by dprayer1 2012-01-02Thanks
Rated with
by ronbarnas 2011-12-29Good article some sentences must be reword a little.
Rated with
by Kymediz 2011-12-29good writer
