Ratings for writer AnshuRanjan
 |
Real name Username |
Anshu Ranjan AnshuRanjan |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by nazalfa 2012-09-16 for Article: Cartier Santos 100 XL reviewsorry, I need more quality review.
Rated with
by vithounh 2012-09-11 for Article: Get week unemployment benefits with workinginoregon.orgmake it easy to read please
Rated with
by mytechbay 2012-09-09 for Article: Norton Online Support ServiceGood
Rated with
by zdotZD 2012-09-07 for Article: Ubot javascript code generatorpoor English writting. The article is boring to read
Rated with
by osahon 2012-02-20 for Article: Get best 2D and 3D picture with Samsung PN50C8000 50-Inch 1080p 3D Plasma HDTVFollowed instructions. Well written. Could do with better paragraphing by limiting each paragraph to max 6 lines. Good command of english
Rated with
by Berkinb 2012-02-20 for Article: Avoid traffic tickets with radar detectorsRated with
by jerryaa 2012-02-18 for Article: LG Spectrum Phone: A reviewRated with
by articlesnew 2012-02-17 for Article: Importance of a registry cleanerGrammar
Rated with
by sevenrr 2012-02-14 for Article: Software security servicesRated with
by jevonhayter 2012-02-14 for Article: Bose 321 series III : a complete reviewGood Job!
Rated with
by nativeseo 2012-02-12Spot on! Well written article, thanks.
Rated with
by dimitribanks 2012-02-12Hi , this what I was looking for , thank you ! Writer followed all instructions and produced very good review !
Rated with
by c0rrup 2012-02-11Rated with
by usville 2012-01-11Did not like.
Rated with
by jockster 2012-01-02Rated with
by blythedoll 2012-01-01Rated with
by el_duce 2011-12-27Rated with
by ronbarnas 2011-12-25Rated with
by mireille 2011-12-25Rated with
by shafferb1 2011-12-25full of typos and grammar mistakes. eg. costumers instead of customers
Rated with
by pageplant 2011-12-23doesn't read well
Responded with comment: the requester was not clear with, what he want...
Rated with
by marshie 2011-12-23Good content. Average grammar though
Rated with
by mabont 2011-12-20Too generic
Responded with comment: :-/
Rated with
by mabont 2011-12-20Good article
Rated with
by peter7779 2011-12-19Nice to deal with and good writing, thanks.
Go to page: 1, 2
