the keyword was used way too many times. I specifically asked for a 4% keyword density. this was almost 13%. The wording was decent and readable but needs to be re written with correct keyword density and LSI keywords. 

 

 

 

 

Good job thank you! 

Thank you Vasanth, for your effort in taking on the rewriting of this article. Great work and you over delivered in the extra content, Darren C. 

 

The keyword 'design-phone app' is used only once and is not optimized.There are a few grammatical errors  

Responded with comment: Reason given for rejecting the article seems to be absurd. The denoted keyword was design iPhone app, which was used 4 times in the article. Instead the buyer has notified that design-phone app has been used only one. Shocking and stupefying! 

 

article was robotic sounding but it did abide by our directions and can be massaged to sound less robotic. thanks for your efforts... 

 

Not very good english. Most all people would be reaching for a dictionary.  

Thanks Vasanto, not bad written.. I'm satisfied. 

Points were repetitive and there was too much extraneous text. I'd like to see a simple list of benefits. Writer is on the right track but needs to keep it simple. 

I am very happy with this article from this writer. Although there are a few minor issues with English grammar they will be easy to fix and I'm thrilled that I didn't have to write this article myself. 

 

Very happy with the article written. Some minor adaptations to be done. But all in all very happy with it. 

Thanks, great article 

I believe you captured most of the ideas. 

for the most part the article was pretty good although I will have to make a few changes. I am happy with it and the changes will only take me a couple of minutes.  

Good job. Thanks! 

Great Article thanks :)  

 

Well done...and quick! 

Thank you for your time and effort. Unfortunately, look spun as if you are unfamiliar with topic. However, it's clear, a topic you are familiar with, you would do a great job. 

Nice article that we can use for the the use we requested. Fast turn-around too. Thanks. 

Good article 

Article started well, but become less targeted to my keyword. But the content is Good, and I can use it in the report I want to create. I would use this writer again. 

Well researched, structured, and written. Nicely done. 

 

Good Article! Just what I was looking for! 

nice i like content.  

 

Project No Longer Needed 

The keyword phrase may have been too awkward, so I think the writer did a decent job working with it. I can polish and smooth it out. 

good job 

Rejected for the following reasons:

Would need to much re-writing
Sounds like the article has been 'spun'
Some sentences don't make sense
Grammar very dubious in places 

good writer ! 

 

Thank you for taking the time however we cant use this article as overall doesn't look natural UK English. The keywords have been stuffed and it doesn't flow, not UK English or spelling and needed more local knowledge. We sorry & appreciate your tim 

 

 

Thank you this will work well 

Did exactly what I asked for. Also a quick turn around time. 

Good attempt. But failed to deliver relevant key points 

This is a spun article and does not make sense 

This article is exactly what I needed. The writer has done a great job and will be added to my list to utilize in the future. 

Well written, but you repeated yourself a few times. I also already have a "Tricky interview questions" article on my site, that is why I asked writers to view my site before writing. I'd be happy to take another if you add some more content. 

Probably not as good as i had hoped for but decent enough and time was important on this project for me. The loss of a star is for some poor grammar and a stunted flow here and there but this writer is definitely worth a go