iWriter - Ratings

Home Get Content Write Content About FAQ Contact Register Login

Ratings for writer naga_162000

Real name Username	Adi Tammiraju naga_162000	Would you like to ask this writer a question?	Would you like to have your article written by this writer?
Overall rating

Rated with

by alexrjr 2012-05-12 for Article: Internet and Businesses Online - Internet SEO

Comment was removed by admin

Rated with

by authsales 2012-05-09 for Article: Outboard Gear

Not what I was looking for

Rated with

by amykmrw 2012-05-07 for Article: St Peters Plumber

Rated with

by amykmrw 2012-05-04 for Article: Mr. Washer: the one stop for plumbers in ST. Peters

Poor spelling and grammar

Rated with

by darkvivi 2012-05-03 for Article: locksmith Plymouth MN

decent writer

Rated with

by jazz2903 2012-04-30 for Article: Dazzle DVC 100

sorry, it is good, just not exactly what i was looking for

Rated with

by lewvin 2012-04-26 for Article: Top 10 mobile broadband pay as you go

great thanks

Rated with

by thailanddave 2012-04-25 for Article: Wheelchair Van � Electric Wheelchair for Free by Insurance

the keyword did not appear in the first sentence of the first paragraph which was listed as the most important part and a prerequisite of the project.

Rated with

by neilcoleman78 2012-04-23 for Article: Bike Stunts

Rated with

by TaylorP 2012-04-18 for Article: Enhance the beauty and style of your house with blinds and shades

Numerous grammatical and syntax errors including leaving out articles and incorrect subject-verb agreement among other issues.

Rated with

by sumting4u 2012-04-17

awesome review article

Rated with

by zacxpacx 2012-04-16

This is a random article that has NOTHING to do with what I asked for.

Rated with

by ghotels 2012-04-14

Please read the instructions!

Rated with

by Toplinker 2012-04-14

Not well structured article I had to fix it myself.

Rated with

by babatroy 2012-04-13

Rated with

by namiradaki 2012-04-13

English and grammar were acceptable, writer grasp the concept of the themes required in the article, very happy.

Rated with

by Seosally 2012-04-13

95% there sorry

Rated with

by MosierData 2012-04-12

Article will need to be touched up and the writer used some odd words like "avail" over and over but it is workable.

Rated with

by saperillo 2012-04-09

article is okay and readable, need some minor editing though

Rated with

by bluej58 2012-04-03

Thanks you did good job

Rated with

by sixfacesinc 2012-02-25

Thanks for the article

Rated with

by nico7980 2012-02-23

Too generic.

Rated with

by nico7980 2012-02-23

Very Generic...irrelevant info in many paraghaphs and some grammar mistakes....thx anyway :)

Rated with

by trybpo 2012-02-22

not enough info, ideas are repetitive, and keywords are not used. sorry, can't use this

Rated with

by TomPritch 2012-02-22

not good enough

Show per page: 10 25 50

Go to page: 1, 2