Rated with
by
rodder7 2012-01-21 for
Article:
NAMI, in our own voice
Rated with
by
dpepper 2012-01-20 for
Article:
cheap pet insurance for cats
Overall not bad the writer used or didn't use plurals in the right way, a few words the tense was off or the word was incomplete for example the writer used the word cover instead of coverage but I understood what the writer was trying to convey.
Rated with
by
carlgerber 2012-01-19 for
Article:
Canyon Road Santa Fe
Rated with
by
usville 2012-01-19 for
Article:
Dish Network Internet & HughesNet
Rated with
by
David321 2012-01-18 for
Article:
ADULT DIAPERS
Good article.
Rated with
by
righthatseo 2012-01-16 for
Article:
Easy scholarship
Improper English
Rated with
by
brianhorn 2012-01-16 for
Article:
invisible dog fence
Rated with
by
bigalex00 2012-01-16 for
Article:
L-Carnitine Weight Loss
Did not follow instructions through (My instructions are very clear)
Did not mention keyword at all!
Explained basics about subject, when clearly stated that this is a secondary article on a site devoted to the subject.
Rated with
by
midas25 2012-01-13 for
Article:
meaning of relationship
didnt follow instructions exactley ,but otherwise done good quick job
Rated with
by
relsol1 2012-01-13 for
Article:
foreplay
poor grammar.
Thank you
not written well and not keyword rich
"Please also do not use shoddy spelling or grammar or it will also be automatically rejected."
Great content however terrible English.
Rated with
by
tfbpa1 2012-01-09
Some grammar mistakes and keywords not used in specific order.