Ratings for writer adelaide
 |
Real name Username |
Adelaide adelaide |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by alexseo 2012-09-01Rated with
by alexseo 2012-09-01Rated with
by JPINVEST7 2012-09-01grammer, Its hard to read the article so that it makes sence
Rated with
by alpha5th 2012-08-31Rated with
by sergeru 2012-08-30Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-08-30Rated with
by wingerdkm1 2012-08-29Very well written, great style.
Rated with
by daydreamer83 2012-08-28Rated with
by VitaRank 2012-08-28Rated with
by grabow 2012-08-28This article was just satisfactory but had a lot of grammatical errors
Rated with
by holidaygiftnation 2012-08-15Rated with
by joe2111 2012-08-15Rated with
by drgthang 2012-08-11Rated with
by gaydoswealth 2012-08-11Poorly written article. Sentences make little sense.
Rated with
by sirknight1980 2012-08-11Rated with
by sirknight1980 2012-08-10Thanks... quick and well-written. Would like to work with this writer again.
Rated with
by narnie55100 2012-08-10This article has too many grammatical errors. The title doesn't make sense, and many sentences are missing the a or an that makes it a complete sentence.
Rated with
by miracure 2012-08-10great thanks
Rated with
by paintingsgalore 2012-08-10Great article! thanks.
Rated with
by brendagagne 2012-08-09followed directions, however there were grammar mistakes that I will have to go and fix.
Rated with
by editor_tr 2012-08-09Awkward sentences. Too simple wording
Rated with
by svtdbird 2012-08-09Rated with
by raybern 2012-08-07Rated with
by holidaygiftnation 2012-08-07Rated with
by teamturner 2012-08-07Good article
Rated with
by Skywalker 2012-08-06Great Job!
Rated with
by tylerherman 2012-08-06Rated with
by kcseke 2012-08-03The content is ok but the language, wording and grammar make it sound like it was written by a non native speaker.
Rated with
by carl55 2012-08-02Way to many grammar mistakes in the article. Does not read very well. Not a quality article.
Rated with
by crazydog 2012-08-02Rated with
by mikelinley 2012-07-31Thanks
Rated with
by crazydog 2012-07-30Rated with
by holidaygiftnation 2012-07-29Rated with
by tylerherman 2012-07-28Rated with
by gatensj 2012-07-27very thin review, I expressly asked for a 'review'
Rated with
by nkforbes 2012-07-25Thank you.
Rated with
by bill2432 2012-07-25Rated with
by D.D.eight.five 2012-07-24Rated with
by merledas 2012-07-24no correct use of english
Rated with
by bkempa 2012-07-24Rated with
by maxim79 2012-07-21Rated with
by Dazzer 2012-07-20Rated with
by teamturner 2012-07-20Good article.
Rated with
by drgthang 2012-07-18Very well done..thanks!
Rated with
by alexseo 2012-07-17Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-07-17WTF? The title was online vs offline marketing and I got a story about branded gazebos. I know that you writers tend to work on keyword density-don't.It's irrelevant since 2009
Rated with
by yralph59 2012-07-16too much on intro and not enough to the actual list of dogs that don't shed. Also no effective use of the keyword phrase. Clearly english is not good
Rated with
by willicolon 2012-07-16I like
Rated with
by erincantona2010 2012-07-16Article is good, but low (<1%) targeted keyword density.
Rated with
by donnachis 2012-07-14Great article, thanks!
