Rated with
by
schogini 2013-05-10 for
Article:
PhoneGap Development
<b><i>Article was reported as SPAM</i></b>
Rated with
by
schogini 2013-05-10 for
Article:
Hiring HTML5 Developer
<b><i>Article was reported as SPAM</i></b>
Rated with
by
schogini 2013-05-10 for
Article:
Mobile game development
<b><i>Article was reported as SPAM</i></b>
Rated with
by
schogini 2013-05-10 for
Article:
Mobile web development
Sorry, did you write this?
Rated with
by
schogini 2013-05-10 for
Article:
Facebook app development
Sorry, did you write this?
Rated with
by
schogini 2013-05-10 for
Article:
Mobile applications development
Sorry, did you write this?
Rated with
by
schogini 2013-05-10 for
Article:
Gamesalad and its details
Sorry, did you write this?
Rated with
by
althorn 2013-05-08 for
Article:
1031 tax exchange
This article makes no sense.
Rated with
by
limbovision 2013-05-07 for
Article:
Estate liquidation services
This article barely makes sense.
Rated with
by
sagisol 2013-05-07 for
Article:
Owl Baby Bedding
Thanks for the article.
Writer using a spinner. Horrible work.
just doesnt make sense.
Rated with
by
b13c01 2013-05-05
The article reads as though it has been spun, some of the wording does not read naturally and some does not make sense.
This article has been heavily spun to the point of being almost impossible for a human being to read and understand. This makes me believe the article is also not original.
Rated with
by
tofrar 2013-05-04
<b><i>Article was reported as SPAM</i></b>
The article doesn't read well at all and looks very spammy. A lot of the content doesn't make much sense and the phrase 'back torment' is used throughout far too much. Also, poor grammar and spelling.
This is a spun article that makes no sense to the reader. I clearly stated that spun & sloppy articles would be rejected.
Followed the brief well and wrote fairly technical piece. Some minor grammar issues but aside from this I am happy with the work overall.
Was not what I was looking for. Need something that is a littlle more informative and unique. Writer seemed to force the points in the article instead of allowing it to be natural.
This article does not make any sense. Many grammatical errors.
Go to page:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10, ...