Ratings for writer karanjawrite

Real name
Username
Write karanja
karanjawrite
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by WritingMarketer 2012-02-01
Special instructions were not followed. 

Rated with 
  by stodary 2012-02-01
Writer missed few keywords from the instruction, that is why he/she was rated as 4 stars 

Rated with 
  by csgcsg 2012-02-01
no follow instructions being 5 paragraphs 

Rated with 
  by trybpo 2012-02-01
informative but has the same formatting problem with the other article. if writer can fix this, then there'll surely be more orders heading his way! 

Rated with 
  by trybpo 2012-02-01
informative, but not well formatted. next time, please divide the article into paragraphs with subheadings and bullets. thanks! 

Rated with 
  by fresco 2012-01-31
well done 

Rated with 
  by zoephoenix 2012-01-31
 

Rated with 
  by mikelinley 2012-01-31
Thanks 

Rated with 
  by mikelinley 2012-01-31
No article title and very poorly written. This writer is not recommended 

Rated with 
  by Blogertize 2012-01-31
This article is too general in content and does not follow the instructions given. 

Rated with 
  by cdubu1 2012-01-31
 

Rated with 
  by deejayvirg 2012-01-30
 

Rated with 
  by veltman 2012-01-30
not sure if the topic was fully understood, but good work nevertheless! 

Rated with 
  by essiomarketing 2012-01-30
Great and thanks 

Rated with 
  by essiomarketing 2012-01-30
Yeah ok 

Rated with 
  by maseline 2012-01-30
Once again it is obvious that the writer is not using American English, but is using English as a second language and does not know how we as Americans speak to another.I am not interested in a sales letter.I wish to educate the public & get clicks.  

Rated with 
  by harri193 2012-01-30
 

Rated with 
  by bamn09 2012-01-30
great content 

Rated with 
  by natoli 2012-01-30
good articles thanks 

Rated with 
  by tripvendor 2012-01-30
middle sections seem a bit spintaxed and don't make a lot of sense 

Rated with 
  by addsman1953 2012-01-30
 

Rated with 
  by wecomm 2012-01-30
Article is not written well at all. 

Rated with 
  by chateau 2012-01-29
Grammar is inadequate quality. Good word selection but syntax needs to be greatly improved. Not native English flow. Good try with some decent thoughts, though. 

Rated with 
  by limadijaya 2012-01-29
 

Rated with 
  by guess21dan 2012-01-29
great stuff many thanks. 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4
 

Copyright 2011-2014 iWriter.com