Rated with
by
toddherman 2012-03-05 for
Article:
Website Companies
bad spelling
Rated with
by
chrishaycock 2012-03-05 for
Article:
Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
Good, thank you.
Rated with
by
gregweir 2012-03-05 for
Article:
Negotiation Aspects
Article can be used almost verbatim.
Rated with
by
hangten 2012-03-05 for
Article:
House Cleaning in New Jersey
Rated with
by
cdubu1 2012-03-01 for
Article:
Search engine optimistation
Great thanks
Rated with
by
cdubu1 2012-03-01 for
Article:
Website Design Essex
great thanks
Rated with
by
geoffbrand 2012-03-01 for
Article:
Relevance of Quality back links to SEO
Rated with
by
geoffbrand 2012-02-29 for
Article:
Effective SEM strategies
Rated with
by
carlgerber 2012-02-28 for
Article:
Social Media Marketing
Rated with
by
toddherman 2012-02-24 for
Article:
Backlinks and their importance to SEO
good thanks
Well written article
A great oronect by this writer!
Very nice work. Professional, readable and detailed.
The article written is not about SEO services it is entirely about on-page optimisation. Also it does not contain the specified secondary keywords.
Seems to be spun,very jumbled
great thanks
okay
too technical, did not read well
Poor content. Repeated use of the word &ndash ???
This has nothing to do with the requested assignment of blogging, this is all about social media. In addition, there are way to many spelling and grammatical errors
Rated with
by
Chozen 2012-02-15
Not what I'm looking for. Article is good but does not qualify based on my specific criteria.
Thank you.
Failed to follow instructions; capitalize first letter in each word of article, use keyword in body.
Failed to use the keyword in the article.
Good writing however failed to use the keyword in the body as instructed.
Good work.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Please, this is about search engine marketing and not search engine optimization. Thanks for your time.
Rated with
by
Chozen 2012-02-12
I want to german
Responded with comment: shoudnt "I want to german" be in the specifications? waste a lot of less time for everybody concerned.
The content writing does not look professional and also I mentioned I need to have some sales pitch since it is a web page content it is not there. Also the research by the writer is so poor regarding the subject.
thank you for submitting this article.
I felt some of the grammar and words would have required more of a rewrite than I have time for.
I appreciate your efforts
Rated with
by
castor 2012-02-10
This article is not about my topic/keyword
Rated with
by
cdubu1 2012-02-10
Great thanks
Rated with
by
oded24 2012-01-15
The style of this article is completely off, the author talks about losing weight etc. which is off topic, and the conclusion is terribly weak.
Another great article.