Ratings for writer Profit101

Real name
Username
Paul Bascom
Profit101
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by standfast 2011-09-29 for Article: Patio roofing materials - The things you need to know
 

Rated with 
  by sambigger 2011-09-29 for Article: Anti-aging products - A more detailed look at some of the choices
way too many grammatical errors. 

Rated with 
  by sambigger 2011-09-29 for Article: Anti-aging skin care products - The knowing of what to look for
This article has bad grammar and it looks like it was spun from another article and not double checked for grammatical errors. 

Rated with 
  by sambigger 2011-09-29 for Article: Anti-aging products - An earlier start makes a decades difference
grammar is bad and it certainly has been poorly spun from another article. I don't care about spinning, but you at least have to pass the grammar test so no one can tell. 

Rated with 
  by sambigger 2011-09-29 for Article: Anti aging products - Look your best while feeling great
The grammar is very bad in many places 

Rated with 
  by sambigger 2011-09-29 for Article: Antiaging products -Tips on choosing the product best suited for you
The grammar in just the first paragraph is very bad. I didn't have to go any further. 

Rated with 
  by sambigger 2011-09-29 for Article: Anti-aging products - Things you need to know
The article looks spun and some of the grammar is poor. Sometimes it's obvious that an article was spun, such as "Anti-aging goods" appears to be spun from "anti aging products". I would never be able to get the article approved like this. 

Rated with 
  by sambigger 2011-09-29 for Article: Skin care products with you in mind
nice job. Thank you. 

Rated with 
  by lexscripta 2011-09-28 for Article: Wedding flower arrangements - A good guideline to follow
Poor English and grammar 

Rated with 
  by lexscripta 2011-09-27 for Article: Wedding flower Arrangements - Before you start your planning read this!!
Cant understand what you wrote. Looks like you spun the article or that you cannot speak english. 

Rated with 
  by nikkijames 2011-09-27
This article is not ledgable and make absloutly no sense at all. I can not use this article on any of my sites.  

Rated with 
  by vikki2727 2011-09-27
Great writer. Followed my instructions for keywords to a T :) Very quick delivery. Would us this writer for future projects! 

Rated with 
  by vikki2727 2011-09-27
Wahoo, great article that felt like the writer was taking to me about acne and I don't even have acne! :) Great placement of keywords throughout the body of the article. Would us author for future projects! 

Rated with 
  by vikki2727 2011-09-27
Great article and great writer! :) Loved the flow of the articles and keyword were place throughout the body. Will use writer for future projects. 

Rated with 
  by markvs 2011-09-26
article was obviously spun and numerous grammar and basic sentence structure not fixed
 

Rated with 
  by markvs 2011-09-26
 

Rated with 
  by markvs 2011-09-26
article was obviously spun and grammar and basic sentence structure not fixed. article title not relevant 

Rated with 
  by markvs 2011-09-26
No article title. Keyword phrase not used in article. Too many grammar mistakes and incomplete sentences. Article was obviously spun with no grammar corrections made. 

Rated with 
  by danielch1 2011-09-23
looks spun  

Rated with 
  by limadijaya 2011-09-23
 

Rated with 
  by limadijaya 2011-09-23
Good job. Thank you. 

Rated with 
  by Clayton1 2011-09-23
terrible, i have ignored this writer. i wish there was a 0 for stars 

Rated with 
  by Clayton1 2011-09-23
poor quality, writer not proofing after spin 

Rated with 
  by Clayton1 2011-09-23
misspellings, easy to see its a spin, terms replaced do not read well  

Rated with 
  by andyd92 2011-09-23
Too many mistakes in English & grammar.  

Rated with 
  by munfaridon 2011-09-23
good writer 

Rated with 
  by munfaridon 2011-09-23
good writer 

Rated with 
  by munfaridon 2011-09-23
good writer 

Rated with 
  by munfaridon 2011-09-23
Good writer 

Rated with 
  by munfaridon 2011-09-23
very good writer +++ 

Rated with 
  by munfaridon 2011-09-23
Very good writer 

Rated with 
  by Built4Biz 2011-09-22
 
Responded with comment: Certainly wasn't a problem 

Rated with 
  by Built4Biz 2011-09-22
 
Responded with comment: Would definitely work with you again 

Rated with 
  by Built4Biz 2011-09-22
 
Responded with comment: Would work with you again 

Rated with 
  by Built4Biz 2011-09-22
 
Responded with comment: It was my pleasure 

Rated with 
  by Built4Biz 2011-09-22
 
Responded with comment: Thanks alot for the opportunity and your review time was a bit lengthy but I believe it was for a good reason 

Rated with 
  by Built4Biz 2011-09-22
 
Responded with comment: Thanks again 

Rated with 
  by chardee42 2011-09-21
There were a number of issues with the article.

For example, what is "supplement N" and "product N"? There were also a number of grammatical and incorrectly used synonyms.  

Rated with 
  by hockeyguy82 2011-09-21
just used spun content english was very bad 

Rated with 
  by hockeyguy82 2011-09-21
the article was just of spun garbage of the web 

Rated with 
  by fitdavid 2011-09-21
first sentense

Item want to know is not right fix it up 

Rated with 
  by heatherene 2011-09-20
The English in this article does not flow well and in a lot of cases does not make sense. I would have to rewrite this article to use it and that is not what I am paying for. Thank you 

Rated with 
  by heatherene 2011-09-20
The English in this article does not flow well and in a lot of cases does not make sense. I would have to rewrite this article to use it and that is not what I am paying for. Thank you 

Rated with 
  by heatherene 2011-09-20
The English in this article does not flow well and in a lot of cases does not make sense. I would need to rewrite this articles to use it and that is not what I am paying for. Thank you. 

Rated with 
  by Built4Biz 2011-09-20
 
Responded with comment: Thanks for the opportunity.Pretty fast response 

Rated with 
  by Built4Biz 2011-09-20
 

Rated with 
  by stevewyman 2011-09-20
this is not english its cut and pasted somebody else content badly. writer will be ignore going forward 

Rated with 
  by emrklnd@bellsouth.net 2011-09-20
Sorry, this writer wrote another article before I had read and rejected the first article. This article is rejected for the same reasons as the first. 

Rated with 
  by emrklnd@bellsouth.net 2011-09-20
This article appear to be spun. Not only is it not making sense, the grammar is horrible. This article is unreadable and unusable. 

Rated with 
  by thembc 2011-09-20
This article does not contain 1 properly constructed sentence. 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2
 

Copyright 2011-2013 iWriter.com