good writer
good writer
good writer
Good writer
very good writer +++
Very good writer
Responded with comment: Certainly wasn't a problem
Responded with comment: Would definitely work with you again
Responded with comment: Would work with you again
Responded with comment: It was my pleasure
Responded with comment: Thanks alot for the opportunity and your review time was a bit lengthy but I believe it was for a good reason
Responded with comment: Thanks again
There were a number of issues with the article.
For example, what is "supplement N" and "product N"? There were also a number of grammatical and incorrectly used synonyms.
just used spun content english was very bad
the article was just of spun garbage of the web
first sentense
Item want to know is not right fix it up
The English in this article does not flow well and in a lot of cases does not make sense. I would have to rewrite this article to use it and that is not what I am paying for. Thank you
The English in this article does not flow well and in a lot of cases does not make sense. I would have to rewrite this article to use it and that is not what I am paying for. Thank you
The English in this article does not flow well and in a lot of cases does not make sense. I would need to rewrite this articles to use it and that is not what I am paying for. Thank you.
Responded with comment: Thanks for the opportunity.Pretty fast response
this is not english its cut and pasted somebody else content badly. writer will be ignore going forward
Sorry, this writer wrote another article before I had read and rejected the first article. This article is rejected for the same reasons as the first.
This article appear to be spun. Not only is it not making sense, the grammar is horrible. This article is unreadable and unusable.
Rated with
by
thembc 2011-09-20
This article does not contain 1 properly constructed sentence.