Ratings for writer ganesh66
 |
Real name Username |
ganesh66 |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by RacAllen 2012-02-05 for Article: Search Engine OptimizationWriting style not what I wanted.
Rated with
by Jonno09 2012-02-04 for Article: Tips for Penis Enlargementsorry this is poorly written, no sentence structure and words run into each other, thank you for trying
Rated with
by pageladder 2012-02-03 for Article: Luxury La Jolla CA Homes for Sale Will Make You SmileRated with
by syoung 2012-01-31 for Article: Alexander Flemingtotally unrelated to the keyword
Rated with
by syoung 2012-01-31 for Article: Self confidencenothing in it is related to the keyword i asked you to write about
Rated with
by syoung 2012-01-31 for Article: REFLECTION OF YOUR LIFEWhat was that? That's purely non-related to what i was asking.
Rated with
by Kyrkviken 2012-01-31 for Article: Egypt - The wonderful place to visitYou HAVE to have facts, names AND a REASON WHY! You are just blubbering!
Rated with
by jockster 2012-01-30 for Article: Blog creationdidnt listen to my instructions
Rated with
by articlesnew 2012-01-26 for Article: Fly with Pro Flight SimulatorRated with
by kselvamathan 2012-01-19 for Article: LAND ROVER SERVICERated with
by kselvamathan 2012-01-19Rated with
by kselvamathan 2012-01-19not bad
Rated with
by isvirtual 2012-01-18Rated with
by isvirtual 2012-01-18Sorry: grammar, spelling, punctuation all too much of an issue.
Rated with
by jkittle79 2012-01-18Good Content
Rated with
by rodrigopinto 2012-01-17text does not make much sense, it is saying about rubber roof and in the middle starts saying about shingles that is a totally different kind of roof... also does not mention my company that does this kind of service... and some other things...
Rated with
by rodrigopinto 2012-01-17Very Good writer, will order more articles!
Rated with
by crasymind 2012-01-17well done
Rated with
by douglaslampi 2012-01-14Sorry, I'm not looking for general information - this has to be very specific. Not bad structurally, but if you are not playing the game, you are not qualified to write for it.
Rated with
by CassieW 2012-01-13Has fluff words to meet the word count;I'll have to edit it a bit but I can use it. Thanks
Rated with
by organiser1 2012-01-13Rated with
by tjinhean 2012-01-12Not that professoinal and could not fit in with the usage. Sorry to reject this article but it does not fulfil the purpose.
Rated with
by makeusawebsite 2012-01-12nice work
Rated with
by dzagana 2012-01-102 users submitted exactly same articles!
