Ratings for writer jackp2
 |
Real name Username |
odira samwel jackp2 |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by clinicvitamins 2012-03-17Rated with
by teamturner 2012-03-17Ok article.
Rated with
by sunexos 2012-03-15Stop using the word "quite" so much. Write with nouns and verbs, not adverbs and adjectives. In general the content was to vague and generalized comparing to the other 11 articles I had written for the exact same price. Get specific
Rated with
by jrcwide 2012-03-15Rated with
by Purple Cow Communications 2012-03-13Very well written. Thanks.
Rated with
by vanished 2012-03-11The article is good but you didn`t follow the instructions!
Rated with
by Sisonize 2012-03-08Nicely written! Great turnaround time too. Thanks so much.
Rated with
by Sisonize 2012-03-07Thanks for the great article and the quick turnaround.
Rated with
by yournewventure 2012-03-07Rated with
by quoteguy 2012-03-06Well written articles with just a few grammer errors.
Rated with
by Godefroy75 2012-03-03Rated with
by blogging4friends 2012-03-02Rated with
by dallas133 2012-03-02Right on the money!
Rated with
by mavicks 2012-03-01Well done
Rated with
by grabdavid 2012-03-01Rated with
by kjellanderton 2012-03-01Rated with
by xpirtdesign 2012-02-29Rated with
by daydream 2012-02-29The sentences in the article do not flow smoothly
Rated with
by xpirtdesign 2012-02-28Rated with
by stevec11 2012-02-27Rated with
by djmokoia 2012-02-27 I want an article about Queens college, not 2 paragraphs about Queens and the rest generically written about the university.
There are also spelling and grammar errors in this article
There are also spelling and grammar errors in this article
Rated with
by kennymack 2012-02-27Too general. I already have a general article on scooters. I want an
article more about Kawasaki scooters. Why I would buy that specific
make.
article more about Kawasaki scooters. Why I would buy that specific
make.
Rated with
by mtquick89 2012-02-24Great job, just what I wanted!
Rated with
by mike11 2012-02-24low keyword density,large paragraphs
Rated with
by sam132 2012-02-24First half was good, second half was really badly formatted (one huge paragraph) alongside poor grammar (lack/inappropriate capitals).
Sorry to reject, another few minutes spent on the article and I would of accepted it.
Sorry to reject, another few minutes spent on the article and I would of accepted it.
