Ratings for writer kellywhite
 |
Real name Username |
kellywhite |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by chidi11 2012-03-23 for Article: not what i wanted at all
Rated with
by roys1984 2012-03-23 for Article: Rated with
by dkelso 2012-03-20 for Article: great content, thanks!
Rated with
by Benjicreative 2012-03-20 for Article: nice work
Rated with
by mtitania 2012-03-20 for Article: The conclusion of the article did not quite match with the beginning, but overall, there is a lot of good information here.
Rated with
by firstinkjets 2012-03-16 for Article: DIDNT READ WELL
Rated with
by jochris26 2012-03-16 for Article: Excellent article. thank you!
Rated with
by tnphoneman 2012-03-15 for Article: Rated with
by Sunitaa 2012-03-14 for Article: Rated with
by mcardenal99 2012-03-13 for Article: not on topic
Rated with
by quoteguy 2012-03-11Keyword was rarely used in article. Article did not have much value. Parents saving for college is one of the biggest sources and was not even mentioned.
Rated with
by quoteguy 2012-03-11Comment was removed by admin
Rated with
by KarenChapple 2012-03-10 A GOOD ARTICLE FOR SOME OTHER PURPOSE BUT NOT REALLY FOCUSED ON "WATERFRONT"APARTMENTS
Rated with
by rsuarez18 2012-03-07Sorry, you did not stay on the topic of just re-rewriting my article. Also most sentences do not make sense. Thank you for trying.
Rated with
by snakeoil 2012-03-07thanks!
Rated with
by tyhuls 2012-03-06Rated with
by Purple Cow Communications 2012-03-06I can see that you wanted to do a good job here but English doesn't seem to be your first language. There are also words missing in the intro. It does seem to get better later and there are bits that I can use but I wouldn't pay for bits. Good Luck.
Rated with
by Purple Cow Communications 2012-03-06English grammar is a problem for this writer. I can see that they put some effort into it but there are unfinished sentences and words used arbitrarily.
Rated with
by rinvijgg 2012-03-04Poorly Written
Rated with
by 26weekplan 2012-03-04Sorry, this doesn't read well.
Rated with
by keithk 2012-03-04The presentation and format of this article seemed to lack care and quality. There were also typos that should not have been there.
Rated with
by James2Dylan 2012-03-04Rated with
by jrcwide 2012-03-04Rated with
by halcyon100 2012-03-03nice job thanks
Rated with
by halcyon100 2012-03-03thanks - it's just about ok
