Ratings for writer chemidv
 |
Real name Username |
chemidv |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by webdelux 2013-02-01 for Article: Pinnacle Taxnot what i am looking for.
Rated with
by bobseoffice 2012-03-16 for Article: Rated with
by deehotom 2012-03-16 for Article: fairly well written article, no real complaints
Rated with
by leannemordue 2012-03-16 for Article: Rated with
by blogging4friends 2012-03-15 for Article: Rated with
by Sisonize 2012-03-15 for Article: I'm sorry I can't accept this article. This article is poorly written. The sentences do not flow right. There are spelling errors. The quality of writing is just not I had expected.
Rated with
by marksmith1974 2012-03-15 for Article: I would like more technical information about electric golf trollies instead of benefits to health.
Rated with
by nichemarkettools 2012-03-15 for Article: Grammar is not acceptable. Reads like spun content.
Rated with
by liann2 2012-03-15 for Article: Rated with
by webular 2012-03-14 for Article: HCG as a weight loss supplement is not approved by the FDA... you have too many false facts in this article and too many grammar errors
Rated with
by mbpage 2012-03-14Rated with
by rfyffe 2012-03-14Rated with
by wicaksono 2012-03-14the writer did not mention any specific place
Rated with
by alexseo 2012-03-14Rated with
by SEOPeter 2012-03-13Rated with
by acomedian 2012-03-13Thank you, nice job!
Rated with
by MikelPerez 2012-03-13Rated with
by stanb1 2012-03-13The article is too general, this is not what I've been looking for, sorry.
Rated with
by angelcoding 2012-03-13Poorly written - it just feels like a load of sentences taken from other articles and thrown together to make a new article. Some parts don't even make sense to a native English speaker.
Rated with
by mykrock 2012-03-13Very basic writing and not in a friendly tone. English structure is not very good.
Rated with
by rinvijgg 2012-03-12Rated with
by jay_bees 2012-03-12This article was horrible. Just a spun article with terrible grammar.
Rated with
by krishna1964 2012-03-12The article was not written in the same format as previous ones written by Sonys. I would like to write it please as I requested.
Rated with
by kknoll@vegastechgroup.com 2012-03-12Too many sentences that are stating the same thing over and over again.
Rated with
by Purple Cow Communications 2012-03-12There were some good points and I came very close to accepting but unfortunately the English just wasn't at the level it needed to be at.
Rated with
by willpeach 2012-03-11Article does not address the title of the project nor follows the instructions.
Rated with
by SewerCont2011 2012-03-11Thanks. Good article.
Rated with
by mediac 2012-03-11Thanks
Rated with
by alemik 2012-03-10Rated with
by slamy enough 2012-03-10No facts about luxury bedding sets. You didn't describe any color, any design. Not informative...
Rated with
by ljt3759 2012-03-09Does not flow, not in a friendly blog format tone. not talking towards the reader its written quite like a wiki page.
Rated with
by jay_bees 2012-03-08some funny grammar but it works.
Rated with
by evanrvd 2012-03-08Rated with
by Sunitaa 2012-03-07Rated with
by SewerCont2011 2012-03-07Thanks. Good article
Rated with
by mochachino 2012-03-07Good write up.
Rated with
by level3 2012-03-06Rated with
by jkasavubu 2012-03-05That is not quite what i requested but i take it...maybe i put a wrong keywords. what I needed was an article about the link.
Thanks anyway. keep up the great work. JK
Thanks anyway. keep up the great work. JK
Rated with
by saruti 2012-03-05Rated with
by saruti 2012-03-05Rated with
by h2unite 2012-03-05bad english structure.
Rated with
by fcmedia 2012-03-05Rated with
by stanb1 2012-03-05Rated with
by alexseo 2012-03-05Rated with
by jrcwide 2012-03-05Rated with
by connectweb 2012-03-05Poor writing style
Rated with
by rankoneads 2012-03-04Rated with
by jrcwide 2012-03-04Rated with
by liann2 2012-03-04Rated with
by jdtate51 2012-03-03This is not premium quality writing. I would use this if I ordered basic, but this is not the standard and grammar I had hoped for.
Go to page: 1, 2
