Rated with
by
Boost99 2013-03-01 for
Article:
SOCCER TRICKS
The writer has poor grammar, and the article doesn't flow. The way they've incorporated the supporting keywords is also clumsy.
Rated with
by
singhavn 2013-03-01 for
Article:
Coach Handbags
Rated with
by
niamori 2011-11-02 for
Article:
lowes credit card login
Rated with
by
eropark 2011-11-01 for
Article:
best iphone cases
I apologize but I have to reject for grammar errors. Next time, please break an article into paragraphs for easy reading.
Rated with
by
miCro81 2011-10-24 for
Article:
New England Patriots
Thanks.
Rated with
by
Rhoody 2011-10-23 for
Article:
Stasi Museum in Berlin
just too many grammar mistakes and wrong statements. Sorry not usable in any way...
Rated with
by
fcmedia 2011-10-21 for
Article:
Custom neon signs
Rated with
by
weblinx 2011-10-19 for
Article:
Air Charter
Quite a few errors in terms of gramma. Appears as though better sounding words have just been thrown in there and in some parts, appears spun
Rated with
by
aphinanbiz 2011-10-18 for
Article:
Indiana payday loan
thank you
Rated with
by
mikejongbloet 2011-10-18 for
Article:
Ski holidays Scotland
Sorry - English not good enough - would have needed extensive re-writing.
Rated with
by
dazcan 2011-10-18
Well done, the writer has do an excellent job!
Sorry I wanted a review of the Raiders regular season game 1. Not a history of the team.
Great writer. Followed my instructions for keywords to a T :) Very quick delivery. Would us this writer for future projects!
Learn how to use punctuation marks. Most of the sentences don't make sense.
There's not even a blank space between the paragraphs.
The whole article, itself, looks like a single lengthy sentence.
It's not really interesting to read.
Rated with
by
jez111 2011-09-17
Keyword put through the article very well and well written.
Rated with
by
ianbed 2011-09-15
Sorry I hate rejecting work, however too many sentences do not make sense and are gramatically incorrect. I'd have to rewrite the whole article myself in order to be able to use it.
We want original content. nothing spun. This is definitely spun.
This is a spun article. It doesn't make sense and is off of someone elses.
Rated with
by
briley 2011-09-15
Nice article
Rated with
by
gles33 2011-09-14
Good article.
Good article.
very pleased thanks
well researched information
Good article.
Good article.
did good with onlly 300 words
Great job just what I wanted.
Rated with
by
dazcan 2011-09-07
Great article and a positive credit to the writer, keep up the great work!
Rated with
by
odle13 2011-09-07
Responded with comment: Thank you very much
Rated with
by
odle13 2011-09-07
Please divide the article for 4 paragraph, add the keyword on each. thanks.
Great article. I appreciate your work!
Too many grammar errors.
Rated with
by
stater 2011-09-05
There were grammatical problems throughout, but the main reason I can't accept this article is that it's not primarily about the topic I specified (how to lose weight) but rather about the keyword.
Rated with
by
Nesian 2011-09-04
The article is grammatically incorrect, the word "the" has been missed numerous times where it should have been used in addition there are other grammatical mistakes which means I cannot use this article
Rated with
by
mcapel 2011-09-04
Quite well researched article, but English is not great
Rated with
by
jswild 2011-09-04
I am rejecting this article as there are numerous grammatical errors, it does not read very well and words were used incorrectly. Overall I feel that the quality of this article is very poor and could not be used for it's intended purpose.
very good artice, good use of keywords, thank you!
I asked to promote my website at the end but instead, promotes all my competitors.
Good, although may have either english issues, or reads like it was run through a spinner.
Responded with comment: Thank you alot
same as before.
it looks like the article was written by a "robot" that can't decide the most appropriate words.