Ratings for writer #44239

Real name
Username
Intrinsic Content
#44239
This account has been discontinued
Overall rating

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-09-05
The subject isn't really explained well. The article is too general. 

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-08-22
The article is too general. A lot of restaurants, but not even one mentioned. The same about the other attractions in the city - nothing specific.  

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-08-09
 

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-08-08
 

Rated with 
  by roy2610 2012-08-07
Good article. Thanks. 

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-08-07
 

Rated with 
  by neilch 2012-08-06
 

Rated with 
  by responsemine 2012-08-03
 

Rated with 
  by responsemine 2012-08-03
 

Rated with 
  by webular 2012-08-02
 

Rated with 
  by webular 2012-08-02
 

Rated with 
  by girlblackbelt 2012-08-02
Fantastic article. Full of good information. 

Rated with 
  by webular 2012-08-01
 

Rated with 
  by fcmedia 2012-07-30
 

Rated with 
  by fcmedia 2012-07-30
 

Rated with 
  by Eliofel 2012-07-29
very good job
thank you  

Rated with 
  by Eliofel 2012-07-29
very good job
thank you  

Rated with 
  by Eliofel 2012-07-29
very good job
thank you  

Rated with 
  by Eliofel 2012-07-29
very good job
thank you  

Rated with 
  by raymondphilippe 2012-07-27
 

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-07-26
There's no Thailand in your keyword; no need to mention Thailand at the end. It looks strange. Otherwise good article. 

Rated with 
  by mixblog 2012-07-26
 

Rated with 
  by OnlineMoneyKid 2012-07-24
 

Rated with 
  by sdjohnson9 2012-07-24
Great, thanks 

Rated with 
  by ArthurPrudentt777 2012-07-23
Great article, many thanks.
Regards. Arthur 

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-07-23
 

Rated with 
  by ArthurPrudentt777 2012-07-22
Thanks for the good article.
Regards. Arthur 

Rated with 
  by kbaxter 2012-07-21
 

Rated with 
  by mayateam 2012-07-20
 

Rated with 
  by online-express 2012-07-19
 

Rated with 
  by Eliofel 2012-07-18
good job
thank you  

Rated with 
  by pjjackson 2012-07-18
 

Rated with 
  by tshirtfrank 2012-07-17
 

Rated with 
  by smallbridge 2012-07-17
There are minor defects in english but the article is well researched. 

Rated with 
  by djjinx13 2012-07-15
It appears English is not your first language, which is okay - but the phrasing at times is really hard to follow. You make a lot of claims, so you must have researched? So please cite the sources as the instructions state - and I will approve... 

Rated with 
  by Vspr01 2012-07-14
Written per my instructions and guidelines. Well done-thank you!! 

Rated with 
  by powerseller 2012-07-12
Some of the sentences had really bad grammar.  

Rated with 
  by girlblackbelt 2012-07-12
Good article. 

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-07-11
 

Rated with 
  by shanethetester 2012-07-10
 

Rated with 
  by pjjackson 2012-07-09
 

Rated with 
  by igniter 2012-07-06
 

Rated with 
  by jonathannewby 2012-07-02
Thanks! 

Rated with 
  by MurisM 2012-06-29
The article really is just a lot of fluff, not fact and example. 

Rated with 
  by QualityArticles 2012-06-27
 

Rated with 
  by QualityArticles 2012-06-27
 

Rated with 
  by QualityArticles 2012-06-27
 

Rated with 
  by QualityArticles 2012-06-27
 

Rated with 
  by QualityArticles 2012-06-27
 

Rated with 
  by QualityArticles 2012-06-27
 

Show per page: 10 25 50
Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 

Copyright 2011-2013 iWriter.com