Ratings for writer smartdigitals
 |
Real name Username |
smartdigitals |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by usville 2012-02-07 for Article: MissouriThank you.
Rated with
by Yohan59 2012-02-04 for Article: Taiwan CultureVery nice article about Taiwanese "art" which would be perfect for a future project about taiwanese art. However, the article for the taiwanese culture project should talk about the taiwanese culture (traditions, languages, religions etc.).
Rated with
by gergo2007 2012-02-04 for Article: pancreatic cancer life expectancycopied article
Responded with comment: what about the copyscape test? .... you are a very bad requester
Rated with
by jhigg245 2012-02-03 for Article: Free Mobile Website BuilderRated with
by jhigg245 2012-02-03 for Article: Mobile WebsitesJust what I wanted!
Rated with
by jhigg245 2012-02-03 for Article: mobile website designGood Job, just what I wanted!
Rated with
by SkylerMn 2012-02-02 for Article: Best Way To Make Money OnlineComment was removed by admin
Responded with comment: forget...
Rated with
by SkylerMn 2012-02-02 for Article: Best Internet Marketing AreaComment was removed by admin
Responded with comment: ok...
Rated with
by Blogertize 2012-02-02 for Article: Strategies For RetirementRated with
by rickyg 2012-02-02 for Article: Accident CompensationWow not for me thanks
Responded with comment: this isn't cool...
Rated with
by Jerryl 2012-02-02again a pretty good article but not the proper headings
Responded with comment: you are crazy...
Rated with
by Jerryl 2012-02-02sorry, looks like parts of the article were just copied and pasted from elsewhere
Responded with comment: BS...
Rated with
by Jerryl 2012-02-02the article is ok, but i want it to use the subheadings I have on the blog ie. I'm not too interested in the history of a supplement, look at it from a customers viewpoint, they are interested in how the supplement effects them...now.
Responded with comment: do not write for this bad requester, he doesn't deserve your time...
Rated with
by Jerryl 2012-02-02you didn't really follow my instructions, but the article looks well researched and is over 800 words so I'll tweak it a bit, thanks
Rated with
by ilainie 2012-02-02Wonderfully researched and written! 6 stars!!!
Rated with
by Talzick 2012-02-02Didn't follow the guidelines.
Responded with comment: requesters like this one are absolutly idiot.... why let just 1 star when the article is well written? if I have not followed the instructions, it does not mean that im a bad writer ....
stay away from the members, he does not deserve your time...
stay away from the members, he does not deserve your time...
Rated with
by liquidhealth 2012-02-01Great Job. I would hire this writer again.
Rated with
by liquidhealth 2012-02-01The writer wrote a wonderful article. I would recommend this writer again.
Rated with
by toddherman 2012-02-01nice, thank you.
Rated with
by toddherman 2012-02-01Nice, thank you.
Rated with
by usville 2012-02-01Not what was asked of the project.
Rated with
by GaijinCoach 2012-02-01Same again talking about ADHD when I requested ADD. Also the special instructions haven't been followed.
Responded with comment: don't waste your time with this bs....
Rated with
by GaijinCoach 2012-02-01This article is ADHD not ADD. You obviously haven't read the special instructions.
Responded with comment: don't waste your time with this bs..... thief
Rated with
by consulting609 2012-01-31Did not write to the audience requested. I will accept the article and re-write it myself. So far you are one of the very few writers that seem to be able to write with acceptable grammar.
Rated with
by chrishaycock 2012-01-31Way too long - didn't follow brief, grammar and sentence structure below par.
Responded with comment: bad bad bad....you are steeling my work and time... shame on you
Go to page: 1, 2
