No thank you. 

 

 

 

1/3 of the content is not subject related 

Fast Delivery - Thanks 

 

 

1) bad grammar
2) Seems to have used spinner to write the article without application of mind
 

Responded with comment: I really wish i knew where exactly my grammar went wrong...or may be you have learnt a different grammar!Nothing could be a lamer excuse than this to reject the article. rating;1 star  

 

The article is completely jumbled between mentioning a process more common to the UK and some statements about the US. It should be U.S. focused and in the U.S. lawyers are not called barristers and there is no section 7 of the insolvency code.  

Responded with comment: Very poor rating you have given me. I don't think it was one* content. Think positive.



 

 

 

I'm sorry to have to reject this article. Too many edits 

Not for USA, for mexico! 

the article had typos and it read like spun article 

 

Poor english 

 

This was not re-written in own words. A spinning tool was used and many of the sentences don't make sense. Example "hard" drive being change to "tough" drive and "on the fly being changed to "on the soar". 

Responded with comment: I think data recovery related with hard disk. So I used hard drive. I don’t think it was wrong. You reject my article without any reason. It’s very bad…… Shit... bad judge.  

Again improper use of wording. We are not marketing "mystics" but psychics. Article cannot be used.  

Incorrect wording used. Article is not what we are looking for.  

Another great one, Thank You Eric 

Article looks spun and some sentances don't make sense, I also don't want links to other websites. 

Responded with comment:
The article wasn't spun. The information was presented in a straight forward manner and given link was not an issue for rejection.