Ratings for writer moreffire
 |
Real name Username |
moreffire |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by glengould 2012-05-08 for Article: What is TRX?sentence structure needs to be worked on but nothing I cant fix/
Rated with
by shop_for_content 2012-05-07 for Article: Hiring a limousine service for your promas requested
Rated with
by peter111961 2012-05-07 for Article: Want to know where to get briggs and stratton pressure washer parts?GREAT ARTICLE
Rated with
by ewoauseo 2012-05-03 for Article: How to install and uninstall Java 7 for OS XRated with
by IAmKCGuy 2012-05-03 for Article: Accessorizing with fashionPunctuation and run-on sentences were a problem in a number of places in the article. It reads 'okay' and so will accept.
Rated with
by kotakeripik 2012-05-02 for Article: Cloud b twilight constellation night lightGood job! He/she is able to follow the instruction and produce quality article. Thank you.
Rated with
by wwwoffers 2012-05-02 for Article: Rheumatoid ArthritisGood job, thanks.
Rated with
by stavros101 2012-05-02 for Article: Resveratrol benefitsRated with
by Tdparisi83 2012-04-28 for Article: Gold Grinding SpotsThe intro has nothing to do with the topic. It will confuse readers before they even get to the body. Also, the term "gold grinding spots" was used, but the article discussed off topic tips. While the info was good, it was off topic, and misleading.
Rated with
by ilainie 2012-04-28 for Article: Featuring the top 10 jungles & rainforests in AsiaSorry, the content of the article is not correct. This should be about the jungle of Asia, not the animals found there. Thank you.
Rated with
by annie1 2012-04-28not bad
Rated with
by mikeramsden100 2012-04-27thank you
Rated with
by empoweredh 2012-04-23Wanted something better.
Rated with
by kanadeca 2012-04-19Rated with
by mikeramsden100 2012-04-19not good enough english grammar I am afraid
Rated with
by memeleh 2012-04-19The article is not written properly. I am not sure you got the topic.
Rated with
by fatherbuggs 2012-04-18Excellent article. Thanks.
Rated with
by akrtw1 2012-04-17Wrong Grammar. Sentences make no sense.
Responded with comment: BE WARE of this stupid fcking scammer. shameonyou!
Rated with
by wilbrierly 2012-04-16Fantastic work! Thank you very much!
Rated with
by cheekykev 2012-04-16Rated with
by blasto 2012-04-14too many mistakes
Rated with
by Bearuk26 2012-04-13Rated with
by Talzick 2012-04-13Rated with
by mxevents 2012-04-13Thank you for the great article
Rated with
by Seosally 2012-04-13Great Work
Rated with
by aleex4 2012-04-12very poor english
Rated with
by tryggvirafn 2012-04-12The article is nice but there are important facts missing that need to be included. There are special requirements needed for this kind of a job and there is no mention of them. As there is no re-write featured I will have to reject.
Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-04-12Rated with
by blythedoll 2012-04-12Rated with
by nidhijaimini 2012-04-10Article title not given
All the keywords are included in one article
Instructions not followed
All the keywords are included in one article
Instructions not followed
Rated with
by RonnieK 2012-04-10Need better grammar, + specific other products
Rated with
by tbgseo 2012-04-09The article needs editing but is detailed.
Rated with
by wilbrierly 2012-04-06Thank you very much, great job!
Rated with
by jevonhayter 2012-04-06Rated with
by evolutionvisions 2012-04-05Rated with
by cdubu1 2012-04-05great thanks
Rated with
by spflorida 2012-04-03The article is usable after a little editing to remove some of the awkward wording.
Rated with
by iostorms 2012-04-03Thank you!
Rated with
by hameem 2012-04-02Good article
Rated with
by borka79 2012-04-01Rated with
by 6130445 2012-03-31very low quality
Rated with
by Lenzer51 2012-03-31Nice stuff, Thanks
Rated with
by ciuntucorina 2012-03-31Good Writer
Rated with
by goransonr@bellsouth.net 2012-03-31Rated with
by adiaho 2012-03-30This article is much more better than the first one written. It has a lot of info. Thanks
Rated with
by ProducerK 2012-03-30The English in this article is not up to par. Too many grammatical errors, and the flow of the article is not done well. Thanks anyway.
Rated with
by tamara 2012-03-30Rated with
by xinixworld 2012-03-30Very good, delivered in super time. Great work
Rated with
by Nopporn 2012-03-29Rated with
by niche2727 2012-03-28Poor use of English and non-standard characters used in text.
