Ratings for writer moreffire
 |
Real name Username |
moreffire |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by dprodr 2012-03-14Doesn't talk about any animation software
Rated with
by mchintan 2012-03-13please stick to the requested KW and don't submit filler content
Rated with
by BULLETPROOFBODY 2012-03-13Thank you!
Rated with
by joeybob 2012-03-13The article is confusing, and is tough for users to follow.
Rated with
by wboster 2012-03-12Rated with
by drewson 2012-03-12Rated with
by jgshwandtner 2012-03-12Rated with
by mrtornado 2012-03-12decent article
Rated with
by wrtrcm 2012-03-09Rated with
by annieooi 2012-03-09Repetitive sentences in a paragraph. Poor construction of sentences. Related searches not included except 1 in one of the paragraph.
Rated with
by JDclient 2012-03-08Rated with
by tamara 2012-03-06Rated with
by paultim71 2012-03-05Rated with
by Charlie123 2012-03-05Bad grammar.
Rated with
by busybee135 2012-03-03Rated with
by basenglah 2012-03-03Great Writing style... however, too much emphasize on women which I don't recall instructed this.
Rated with
by kmedia 2012-03-02Poor grammar and incorrect vocabulary usage. The article was difficult to read.
Rated with
by cherri1 2012-03-02great article, thanks
Rated with
by wredants 2012-02-29Rated with
by annie1 2012-02-27many grammatical errors
Rated with
by josip 2012-02-27Rated with
by dennis09 2012-02-27Grammatical and punctuation errors. Article incomplete and instructions not followed.
Rated with
by sixfacesinc 2012-02-25grammatical errors....
Rated with
by cor3ys 2012-02-25Grammer and spelling is poor, and they do not know the subject there writing about
Rated with
by mond2050 2012-02-24I was very happy with this writer. My topic was on the junk removal industry in Vancouver and I was a bit sceptical that I will find someone here that would write on that topic. But what do you know. Just 12 hours later I got a good one.
Than you.
Than you.
