Ratings for writer RAJEEV.TWR
 |
Real name Username |
RAJEEV TIWARI RAJEEV.TWR |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by BobeKrocrr 2012-12-28 for Article: Home Based Business IdeasRated with
by malusigp 2012-12-28 for Article: Tee-Tick-A brand name In The World Of Personalized T-Shirtsgreat thanks
Rated with
by BobeKrocrr 2012-12-28 for Article: The Best Home Based Business Ideas 2012Rated with
by sandrabf 2012-10-27 for Article: QUALITY ASSESSMENT TEST FOR KETTLESRated with
by czhuzhu 2012-10-26 for Article: A BRIEF DISCUSSION ON LEADERSHIP THEORYWell done. It's all I required. Thanks!!
Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-10-24 for Article: E-Cigarettes - Are they safe?Sorry, you did a good work. You just picked a wrong study and that lead to wrong ending of the article. That professor is paid by a big company to say that. Sorry again.
Rated with
by teamturner 2012-10-24 for Article: BENEFITS OF USING A LETTING AGENTA well written, relevant article that unfortunately has no mention of my specified keyword
Rated with
by rrice2020 2012-10-18 for Article: SEO PowerSuite- A COMPLETE SOLUTIONAWESOME ARTICLE!
Rated with
by kindwill 2012-10-16 for Article: BEST HOME INCOME SYSTEM IDEASRated with
by marketcarolina 2012-10-14 for Article: Ten Benefits Of BrandingGreat! Just what I was looking for.
Rated with
by vincentsun 2012-09-30Rated with
by narnie55100 2012-09-29Thanks
Rated with
by JMFieldMarketing 2012-09-24Very nicely done, included all of the keywords and requirements. Would hire this writer again.
Rated with
by bentlex 2012-09-20Very poor quality
Rated with
by crazydog 2012-09-20Rated with
by 2hourworkday 2012-09-16Thank you very much great article.
Rated with
by Nudgeitup 2012-09-16Hate to do this but the article was too formal in some areas and way lax in others. Also there were a lot of hard to read sentences and things that didn't make sense.
Rated with
by teamturner 2012-09-10good article
Rated with
by InfinitePublishing 2012-08-21Rated with
by wwwoffers 2012-08-20Content is genuinely useful but language is full of small mistakes. The introduction is also off-topic.
Rated with
by mikelinley 2012-08-19Poorly written
Rated with
by NatashaTEAM 2012-08-19Rated with
by Roarge 2012-08-17The focus is too much on the writer and not enough on the audience, and the piece lacks structure. It is by no means terrible, but it is not as good as the other articles received by writers of similar rating.
Responded with comment: thanks a lot for your comment and may your day goes well tomorrow
Rated with
by JohnKS 2012-08-15thanks. good job
Rated with
by risefromthedust 2012-08-14Great article, but my client sells wood grills. So you need to be very complimentary to wood grills in your writing. Please only mention charcoal and gas bbq's as second-best to a wood fire grill.
Responded with comment: i would have done that but nowhere you had mentioned about praising wood grills in the instructions....so just tell me did you do a fair thing by rejecting my article at first and then reducing my rating.:-(
