Ratings for writer surraed
 |
Real name Username |
Suresh Babu surraed |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by jockster 2013-03-08 for Article: There Are Reasons Aplenty As To Why Google+ is Going to be Inevitable in Your Content MarketingLooking for better quality
Rated with
by mickando 2013-03-07 for Article: A York Exercise Bike Can Put You On the Road to FitnessDecent
Rated with
by romanf 2013-03-06 for Article: A Cool Samsung Galaxy S3 Case Can Keep Your Head CoolThank you! very good article
Rated with
by thomlancaster 2013-02-28 for Article: Questions for Content – The Easy Way to Generate Content For Your Websites or Blogs!The article is useable, but isn't closely focused on the topic requested.
Rated with
by bigpat888 2013-01-23 for Article: Indesit Washer Dryers – Go Green While Washing Your Clothes, Indesit Makes it Possible!Rated with
by ziessler 2012-11-16 for Article: Visual Website Optimizer is Your Way to Understanding Your Customers Better, and thereby Increasing Your Online SalesRated with
by misterdan 2012-11-08 for Article: Why Take Japanese Courses in Beyond Language School?Rated with
by rodder7 2012-11-08 for Article: Creating Backlink in a Post-Penguin World and remaining Unaffected from Future Similar UpdatesWriter didn't follow project instructions.
Rated with
by culturechanger 2012-11-03 for Article: What If I Indeed Were a Snob?Thank you for taking the time to write an article. Although salient example, it is not reflective of myself and my audience.
Rated with
by stephenoski 2012-11-03 for Article: Short URLs, Get Them Instantly with HyperShrink!Rated with
by rtookes 2012-10-31Rated with
by lgaylor 2012-05-26Good article...thank you
Rated with
by bowgio 2012-05-26Rated with
by lgaylor 2012-05-25Great Job, Thank you.
Rated with
by mishdog 2012-05-25Grammatical errors, and not a friendly enough tone :( sorry!
Responded with comment: Beware writers, idea thieves are around! Your article will be used elsewhere in a rewritten format, but you will not be paid for your work. Ensure what ‘grammatical errors’ means prior to working for this requester.
Rated with
by govi.ku 2012-05-16Article is ok. But so many grammatical errors
Rated with
by khanlonny01 2012-05-14Thanks!
Rated with
by khanlonny01 2012-05-14Rated with
by thomlancaster 2012-05-10Great job!
Rated with
by thomlancaster 2012-05-10Excellent!
Rated with
by khanlonny01 2012-05-10Thank you!
Rated with
by khanlonny01 2012-05-10Thank you!
Rated with
by thomlancaster 2012-05-07Another well-styled article.
Rated with
by thomlancaster 2012-05-07A well-formatted article which does what I asked for.
Rated with
by thomlancaster 2012-05-06A decent article.
Rated with
by templatepacks 2012-05-03Thank you!
Rated with
by cechapman 2012-04-21excellent work, a little "in your face" but very good
Rated with
by alexseo 2012-04-19Grammar error, semantic error, have you even read the instructions, repeating the same things over and over....
Rated with
by kknoll@vegastechgroup.com 2012-04-19Well done... :)
Rated with
by kaizenify 2012-04-18Rated with
by mcs123 2012-04-17The keywords Nutrigen AM&PM are thrown in too often into the content & this looks very spammy to the search engine
Responded with comment: Don't use the article, I've published it. You could have contacted me on message box for such trivial problems. Think 'out of the box' before you reject articles outright; I could have made corrections and submitted it through message box.
Rated with
by rstock 2012-04-17A little abstract. I'll have to rewrite a portion of it.
Rated with
by isnogood 2012-04-16Quite a lot of grammatical mistakes but apart from that,it seems that you have pretty much copied general info about the topic which makes the article hard to follow and not informative at all.
Rated with
by influx87 2012-04-16Looking for higher quality writing
Rated with
by love6767 2012-04-13Great article.
Rated with
by csalisbury 2012-04-13Good info, but repetitive and a bit awkward with the grammar. Feel free to resubmit
Rated with
by condoso 2012-04-10Great article that is close to what I was looking for...
Rated with
by vincidesigns 2012-04-06Reasonable amount of good content not as comprehensive as I had hoped since I think some of the terms used are still going to be foreign to some. Also there are some grammatical issues, missing words, and sentence structure issues.
Rated with
by userlw 2012-04-05Rated with
by wisewizard333 2012-04-04good work
Rated with
by love6767 2012-04-04Writer did not follow the template.
Responded with comment: If you are satisfied with the written content, you could always use the message box to contact the writer for any formatting concerns. Please communicate with writers to sort out minor glitches. I've now published the article somewhere else. :)
Rated with
by csalisbury 2012-04-03Good article.
Rated with
by wisewizard333 2012-04-03Content seems good... Please read the instructions and rewrite as per the format and details mentioned there
Rated with
by ambergreen 2012-04-03good quality and content structure
Rated with
by yang1ca 2012-04-021.Focus on topic;2.Good organizations of the article;3.Flunt.
Rated with
by MyPhotoStore 2012-04-01Brilliant, one of the best articles I've had written so far. Will definately be making note of your usename!
Rated with
by risefromthedust 2012-03-30Rated with
by oicgroup 2012-03-29Rated with
by westofpluto 2012-03-28Well written. Thank you.
Rated with
by templatepacks 2012-03-27Very well written, thank you.
Go to page: 1, 2
