Ratings for writer lathahema400
 |
Real name Username |
lathahema400 |
This account has been discontinued |
|
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by TKent123 2011-09-13Rated with
by amogilin 2011-09-13Rated with
by organiser1 2011-09-13Rated with
by organiser1 2011-09-13really badly written
Rated with
by organiser1 2011-09-13Rated with
by organiser1 2011-09-13Responded with comment: thank u i can write for you more and more with pleasure!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rated with
by amogilin 2011-09-13Rated with
by innowebmedia 2011-09-12No paragraphs, spelling incorrectly,
Rated with
by madamebridal 2011-09-12It is grammatically incorrect.
Rated with
by Ernie_Hodge 2011-09-11This article just doesn't make any sense. I think it's because of a language difference. I tried to read through the article twice and it just doesn't work.
Rated with
by ralphealjackson 2011-09-11Rated with
by mpgdmd 2011-09-11Terrible. Grammar is very, very poor. This writer has no idea what he or she is talking about.
Rated with
by baaltazar 2011-09-11This article is not about the given keyword. And way too high keyword density.
Rated with
by elanzen 2011-09-10I am not satisfied with this article.
Rated with
by ringitinc 2011-09-09Not proper english.
Rated with
by gfuller28 2011-09-09Rated with
by ts150ts 2011-09-09overuse of keyword- doesnt make sense in parts- didnt follow instructions
Rated with
by ts150ts 2011-09-09i have see this article before- it is copied from somewhere else- please do unique articles habdwritten by you from scratch
Rated with
by thinktaylor 2011-09-09Grammar issues in this article. Also, the writer seemed to have mixed up the keywords they were writing for and used a different one.
Rated with
by calhoun 2011-09-09The article is one long paragraph with no flow.
The article talks about things that has nothing to do with the topic or keywords.
The article talks about things that has nothing to do with the topic or keywords.
Rated with
by tonypsc 2011-09-09Incorrect sentences and phrases. Content not relevant to the tittle
Rated with
by somniak 2011-09-09poor english
Rated with
by benjamteal 2011-09-02This post has a lot of "filler" and would take some time to rewrite before I could use it. It's not about the history of food, but which foods are great for building muscle.
Rated with
by beckystrueblue 2011-09-02The sentences are not very good. It's very hard to read. Does not flow, there are no paragraphs. Some of the content is not pertinent to subject. Poor grammar. It would be way to much work for me to rewrite correctly. Sorry.
Rated with
by matrix 2011-09-01poor english
