Ratings for writer goodwriters
 |
Real name Username |
Susan C. goodwriters |
Would you like to ask this writer a question?  |
Would you like to have your article written by this writer?  |
| Overall rating |  | |||
Rated with
by neuewavemedia 2012-08-28 for Article: How to find best London building companypoor wording, does not read in places
Rated with
by strategist 2012-08-28 for Article: 5 tips for buying rubber stamps on eBayPoor tips
Rated with
by dazmanda 2012-08-28 for Article: How to Make Your Own Dog ClothesT
Rated with
by josipiv 2012-08-27 for Article: Teeth whitening and its affects on your healthDoesn't quite sound right, sorry, thanks for giving it a go
Rated with
by imarket247 2012-08-26 for Article: Latin Mail Order BridesArticle content is disjointed and lacks continuity.
Rated with
by vcaldwe 2012-08-25 for Article: PCC managementgood article just a few typos that I need corrected first
Rated with
by pushtofreeze 2012-08-24 for Article: How to earn online doctoral programsok
Rated with
by imarket247 2012-08-24 for Article: How To Find A Good WifeGood article
Rated with
by paultim71 2012-08-24 for Article: Benefits of white leather sofanot what i was looking for
Rated with
by imarket247 2012-08-24 for Article: What Is A Mail Order Bride?Very good.
Rated with
by informacione 2012-08-23Rated with
by imarket247 2012-08-23Correct the English grammar and resubmit.
Rated with
by VDBVentures 2012-08-23This article met my requirements. The writer provided a quality article and appropriate title as well. Thanks
Rated with
by abeg82 2012-08-23The information you supplied is incorrect plus I didn’t asked for a DIY guide
Rated with
by weblinx 2012-08-22Rated with
by csteam 2012-08-22Grammatically incorrect
Rated with
by khoa.jackie 2012-08-22There are sentences don't make sense!
Rated with
by csteam 2012-08-21No Spinning of article
Rated with
by csteam 2012-08-21Grammatically incorrect
Rated with
by mzonas 2012-08-20Rated with
by strategist 2012-07-31Rated with
by BizMax 2012-07-30Article addressed my key phrases, had some good content for my readers, needed some minor corrections to have it flow well.
Rated with
by BizMax 2012-07-30Article speaks to my target audience, needs some minor corrections.
Rated with
by chachak 2012-07-29thanks for the retry, still not helpfull enough.
Rated with
by sdoun1 2012-07-27Thank you!
Rated with
by josip 2012-07-27thanks
Rated with
by kymobilemedia 2012-07-26Good Job. Thanks
Rated with
by chachak 2012-07-26I did not see major rewriting.
Rated with
by webular 2012-07-25Rated with
by adrimontanari 2012-07-25Good article. Thank you
Rated with
by greggsobek 2012-07-25Well written. The article seemed original, is easily readable, and covered the topic well.
Rated with
by paulgold 2012-07-24Thorough research and attention to detail have made this a very acceptable article on the requested subject.
Rated with
by JoeC21 2012-07-21Hard to make any sense of and not really the laid back fun type of article i was looking for.
Rated with
by Julieann1 2012-07-20good, keep it up
Rated with
by zkyclear 2012-07-19I'm sorry, it's not what I expect
Rated with
by localfocal 2012-07-19The article does not contain the directed keywords and appears to be robot written non sensense.
Rated with
by drnuzum 2012-07-18Thanks
Rated with
by topmentor1 2012-07-18poor syntax doesnt read well. reads like synonym replaced spun content.
Rated with
by nvickery 2012-07-18Very poor English
Rated with
by nvickery 2012-07-18Rated with
by Wizzer 2012-07-17Many thanks, good article
Rated with
by vctexas 2012-07-17too many errors
Rated with
by josip 2012-07-16sorry but some of the content is repetitive
Rated with
by cjernigan 2012-07-13Rated with
by martyone 2012-07-12Thank you
Rated with
by elaine.mesina 2012-07-12This article needs to be edited at a rate of 75%. I don't have the time to do such edit.
Rated with
by nichemarkettools 2012-07-11Rated with
by cdubu1 2012-07-11great thanks
Rated with
by dsgehl 2012-07-10thank you for the article.
Rated with
by rjunior 2012-07-06did not specify 5 reasons... just mumbled on...
